De unitate intellectus contra Averroistas
Description
12/27/25translated as ON THE UNIQUENESS OF INTELLECT AGAINST AVERROISTS www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/8246/ : 18
intellectus, quem Aristoteles dicit potentiam animæ, non est actus corporis
12/28/25translated as ON THE UNIQUENESS OF INTELLECT AGAINST AVERROISTS www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/8246/ : 22
secundum præmissa Aristotelis verba, hæc forma quæ est anima, post corpus remaneat, non tota, sed intellectus;
12/29/25translated as ON THE UNIQUENESS OF INTELLECT AGAINST AVERROISTS www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/8246/ : 25
Aristoteles quærit in tertio de anima, utrum intellectus non separatus a magnitudine intelligat aliquid separatum
whether AGI possible?
12/29/25translated as ON THE UNIQUENESS OF INTELLECT AGAINST AVERROISTS www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/8246/ : 35
intellectus sit pars vel potentia seu virtus animæ quæ est corporis forma
12/29/25translated as ON THE UNIQUENESS OF INTELLECT AGAINST AVERROISTS www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/8246/ : 44
Id autem quo primo Socrates intelligit, sicut sensu sentit, Aristoteles probavit esse in potentia omnia, et per hoc non habere naturam determinatam, nisi hanc quod sit possibilis; et per consequens, quod non misceatur corpori, sed sit separatus.
So materia prima can similarly be said to be immaterial, too?