Theologia moralis (vol. 2)

Description

DjVu pp. 615ff. are on matrimony.
(cf. these transl. of part of n. 919 on how a wife can stimulate herself in order inseminate when her husband does and how oral sex is never a necessary means to the completion of the marital act)

pp. 652ff. are de matrimonio secundum se

Double Effect Reasoning p. 24 (PDF p. 49) cites St. Alphonsus's "very abbreviated treatment of double effect as a general approach to certain cases" (Theologia Moralis vol. 2 XIV, DjVu p. 12).

V §14 ff. (DjVu p. 31ff.) are on delectatio , fruitio , etc. "Dubium II. An et quomodo desideria et delectationes sint peccata."

vol. 2 lib. 6 tract. 5 de matrimonio (p. 687, DjVu p. 691), addressing question "938. Marrieds per se are bound to render (the debt) and sometimes even to exact (the debt).":

1. Neither is bound, speaking per se , to exact the debt, even if per accidens he is sometimes bound to, either out of charity (e.g., to avert the immanent danger of incontinence of the spouse.) … or out of legal justice, in which which public health (salus publica) is endangered without the birth of children.

Integralism ref:10.15: "where populations are declining or threaten to decline, the civil power may offer inducements to married couples to have children."

Does St. Alphonsus go further, arguing that the State can force marrieds to have children? I doubt it, ∵ not all vices are to be suppressed by human law.