[A]nyone...striving after his advancement...is...given to spiritual reading. —St. Athanasius
Quote from: ptlopes on July 30, 2024, 10:14:37 AM"[T]he truth of the practical intellect depends on conformity with right appetite" isn't a reflex principleThat's true, but reflex principles follow from it / are an application of it.
Quote from: ptlopes on July 29, 2024, 05:09:54 PMWhere does St. Thomas teach the principle that "in doubt we are to stand by the view which is presumably true"?Garrigou-Lagrange, O.P., cites Summa Theologica I-II q. 57 a. 5 ad 3, which contains the famous axiom:
Quote from: St. ThomasVerum [...] intellectus practici accipitur per conformitatem ad appetitum rectum.
[T]he truth of the practical intellect depends on conformity with right appetite.
Quote from: Garrigou-LagrangeSt. Thomas, it is true, does cite at times other reflex principles, useful in forming conscience, for example, that in doubt we are to stand by the view which is presumably true. But if he seldom dwells on these reflex principles, it is because he holds that prudential certitude1039 is found in that view which is nearest to evident truth, and most in conformity, not with egoism, but with the inclination to virtue.
Quote from: St. AmbroseQuæ est pulchra in mulieribus, nisi anima, quæ in utroque sexu præstantiam possidet pulchritudinis?(quoted in Krug, De pulchritudine divina p. 64)
What is beautiful in women, if not the soul, which in either sex possesses excellence in beauty?
Quote from: St. AmbroseSolus formæ arbiter petatur Deus, qui etiam in corpore minus pulchro diligat animas pulchriores.(quoted in Krug p. 67)
Let God alone be sought as the judge of loveliness, Who loves even in less beautiful bodies the more beautiful souls.
QuoteGa 5:19-21: "Now the works of the flesh are manifest, which are fornication, uncleanness, immodesty, luxury, Idolatry, witchcrafts {φαρμακία}, enmities, contentions, emulations, wraths, quarrels, dissensions, sects, Envies, murders, drunkenness, revellings, and such like. Of the which I foretell you, as I have foretold to you, that they who do such things shall not obtain the kingdom of God."
QuoteRv 9:21: "Neither did they penance from their murders, nor from their sorceries {φαρμάκων},* nor from their fornication, nor from their thefts."*The New American Bible (NAB) (and NABRE) translates φαρμάκων here as "magic potions."
QuoteRv 21:8: "But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers {φαρμακοῖς}, and idolaters, and all liars, they shall have their portion in the pool burning with fire and brimstone, which is the second death."
Rv 22:15: "Without are dogs, and sorcerers {φαρμακοὶ}, and unchaste, and murderers, and servers of idols, and every one that loveth and maketh a lie."
Quote from: fdsia8ds0 on June 05, 2024, 01:02:18 AMI also notice that the preposition is somethings before, e.g. 'de Sales, Francis', and sometimes after, e.g. 'Liseux, Thérèse de'. Is the a preference, or a specific reason that they differ?Honestly, I don't know which is better; that's why there's variety...
Quote from: fdsia8ds0 on June 05, 2024, 01:02:18 AMI've also wondered whether it should be 'Grignon de Montfort, Louis-Marie', or 'de Montfort, ...', or 'Montfort, ... de'.His is an interesting case, especially since he signed his name variously (according to Le Crom's biography).
Page created in 0.053 seconds with 14 queries.