Recent posts

#1

Anti-Modernism / "Errors of Liberal Education" ...

Last post by Geremia - November 30, 2024, 07:50:59 PM

Letters from the Rector of St. Thomas Aquinas Seminary vol. 3: The Winona Letters, Part 2, pp. 72-77:

In the last few years the Society of St. Pius X has opened up numbers of new schools here in the United States, especially primary schools in the basements of its chapels and church buildings. This reaction to the degeneracy of the public and church schools all around us is normal on the part of Catholic parents and priests. However, starting schools from scratch is still a brave venture in today's circumstances, so, Mother Church having centuries of experience in education, let us recall a little of her ancient wisdom.

The mess into which the world has got itself today flows from heresy; and nearly all modern heresies come back, said Donoso Cortes, to the denial either of the supernatural or of original sin. Now as to the supernatural, Society schools for the (blessed) time being offer little or no worldly advantage to children, e.g. accreditation, so that if parents had no faith in the supernatural, they would hardly resort to Society schools. But as for original sin, while all Catholic parents pay lip service to the dogma, it is in reality so smothered by Liberalism that perhaps few of them realize fully how it spells out in practice, especially in education. So let us begin our help to the schools with the reminder of original sin.

Every one of us, nine months before issuing from his or her mother's womb, was conceived by Adam's fault in a state of disorder and enmity with God–"We were by nature children of wrath" (Eph. 2:3). Now one may for lack of the Catholic Faith disbelieve in such a mystery as sin not committed by a man personally but belonging to him naturally, yet all centuries and all climates are littered with the evidence of a flaw deep in all men's nature, largely wrecking their noble aspirations. In any case, original sin is a fact, the denial of which constitutes the essential error of liberal education, the fight against which is the presupposition of all Catholic education.

Thus Little Johnny may look as though butter would not melt in his mouth, so that his parents think he is a little angel, but Mother Church and good sisters and priests know that because of original sin, he is not only a little angel but also a little monkey, to the point that Scripture–Word of God–says of him (Proverbs 23:13,14), "Withhold not correction from a child: for if thou strike him with the rod, he shall not die. Thou shalt beat him with the rod, and deliver his soul from hell". Again–(Proverbs 22:15)–"Folly is bound up in the heart of a child, and the rod of correction shall drive it away". And then to think that liberals are proud of looking on corporal punishment for school children as a barbaric relic that they in their superior wisdom have left behind! Blind idiots!

Dear parents, support those priests, sisters and teachers who are ready to correct your children. Do not believe Little Johnny when with those melting blue eyes he tells you tales of how cruel and unjust his teachers are! Give him a kiss, put him to bed, then ring up the teacher to hear no doubt a very different story! And then (as long as it is not forbidden by "law") spank Little Johnny for fibbing when he gets up in the morning! In the old days, if Johnny told at home how Sister Battle-Axe had paddled him at school, far from being sympathized with, he was paddled again at home! He soon learned to stop complaining of his teachers!

Thus Catholic education then was, as it always ought to be, a conspiracy between priests, teachers and parents for what they are all agreed on is the good of the child, and Catholic parents used to have the good sense to trust the priests and teachers. That trust was destroyed by Vatican II, but it must be rebuilt. Catholic education cannot work if the parents pull against the teachers. Alas, in many Society schools the complaint is heard that the children are educable; it is the parents who are uneducable! Of course not always, but all too often they are unaware how the false liberal ideals they take for granted paralyze the teaching of true Catholic ideals to their children. Given what efforts such parents have often made, this unconscious self-paralysis is sad.

A second major error of liberalism in education is the glorification of the individual over the common good. As homeschoolers know, boys especially miss being taught amidst a group of boys. Peer pressure does great good or ill, because man is a social animal, designed by God to live and learn in society. Therefore a good school forms boys–and girls–in groups, in classes, in a whole society. Therefore if one rotten apple is spoiling the whole barrel, as often happens until a school is well up and running, and even after, then that rotten apple must go, for the common good of all the other children. Of course if a child is naughty, one will be patient for a while, especially if the naughtiness comes from high spirits rather than malice. But if an apple proves to be rotten, it must be mercilessly thrown out! A Catholic school is not a remand home for misfits, it is NOT a Delinquents' Tender Loving Day Care Centre! It has to teach, not just baby sit, and individuals who render themselves unfit to be taught in the group because of their bad influence on it have no business to be wasting the time of those who are fit and ready to be taught. Delinquents must go! The common good exists, especially in a school, and it is much more important than any one individual on his own. Oh, how liberals lose all sense of this common good!

A third grave error of liberals is their denial of any difference between boys and girls, error crucial at all times, but especially in education from, say, the age of 8 or 9 upwards.  From then girls, it is well-known, mature earlier than boys biologically, and immediately begin distracting the boys, who are liable to grow into being quite happy to be distracted. Nor is the mixed company from puberty onwards a danger only for chastity, grave though that danger is (unless one denies original sin!). The mixed company is also a tremendous waste of educational time, because as any teacher worth his salt will tell you, even in a subject like literature, suitable to be taught to both sexes, if you teach the boys, the girls switch off, whereas if you teach the girls, the boys tune out. This is because God has built boys and girls for entirely different functions (how often must one today say it?) in society, so that He has given them quite different receivers to pick up the quite different things they need, so different that it is impossible even for a genius of a teacher to teach on the wavelength of both of them at the same time. Hence in a mixed class of adolescents, half of the time is being constantly wasted. But do you think liberals will believe that? Deaf and dumb idiots!

And then do you think any self-respecting boys will let themselves get into a competition with girls? Elementary error, to have them compete! Separate their tests! Let the girls excel at what girls should excel in, whatever will form them to be good wives, mothers or sisters (a mother does not have to be dumb!), but let the boys excel at what boys should excel in, and let no girl near the sacred process of making boys into men. The girls around the boys will only block the formation of the men they so need. But teach the boys to respect and to protect the difference of girls, so that the girls no longer feel the obligation imposed on them by our sick society to make themselves second-rate men in order to have any respect!

But above all, dear parents, go right ahead! Take the bull by the horns (take the cow by her eye-lashes!), and get that school up and running! St. John Bosco said God has special graces for adults who look after abandoned youth.  Catholic youth are universally abandoned by an anti-Christian society and a modernist church. You will have trials, because the devil hates true Catholic schools, because he knows how much good they do for the salvation of souls.  In fact the early years of any of our little schools are liable to be more or less of a rollercoaster. But the rewards are immense, as the Gospel says, even in this world, let alone in the next.

And dear parishioners, if you cannot contribute as a teacher, then contribute to your parish school from your pocket. Schools are always costly, especially today when there are few unsalaried priests, brothers or sisters to teach. And those who have the children often do not have the funds, whereas vice versa. God will most certainly reward those also who support the unabandoning of youth.

#2

Holy Scripture / Mt. 19:9 "exceptive clause"

Last post by Geremia - November 12, 2024, 10:59:13 AM

In support of the interpretation that Matthew 5:32 or 19:9 can refer to concubinage is the fact that the word for adultery most commonly used in the OT and NT is μοιχεία, not πορνεία (cf. 1 Cor. 5:1).
Orchard et al., A Catholic Commentary on Holy Scripture:

An alternative Catholic explanation (recently revived, amended and given rabbinic background by J. Bonsirven, S.J., Le Divorce dans le Nouveau Testament, Tournai 1948) objects that the usual OT and NT word for 'adultery' is μοιχεία. It maintains that πορνεία here means concubinage (cf. 1 Cor 5:1)—incestuous marriage within the degree forbidden by the Mosaic Law, Lev 18:1–17. In such a case a man in dismissing (divorcing) the woman is not only guiltless but is actually doing his duty. Our Lord inserts the clause in order to hint that the Mosaic injunctions remain (cf. CR [Clergy Review] 20 [1941], 283–94).

#3

Forum-Related / Happy feast of St. Isidore the...

Last post by Geremia - October 25, 2024, 11:01:03 AM

Happy feast of St. Isidore the Farmer today (🇺🇸 local feast)!

#4

General Discussion / "Freedom of speech is an Ameri...

Last post by Geremia - October 12, 2024, 03:10:59 PM

Freedom of speech is an American birthright.

(Hatch & Walshe 122)

Interestingly, 1936 is the year of the FCC's Communications Act regulating political TV advertising.

#5

Catholic Resources / Re: Writings of the saints and...

Last post by Geremia - September 19, 2024, 11:11:59 AM

Methods of Saying the Rosary by St Louis de Montfort (PDF)

Thank you, but that's already in the e-book library.

#6

Catholic Resources / Re: Writings of the saints and...

Last post by kerrysky - September 19, 2024, 02:59:41 AM

Book of the day (Thursday, 19th of September 2024)

Methods of Saying the Rosary by St Louis de Montfort (PDF)
https://disk.yandex.ru/d/kG4mF6GcjYAWB/Writings%20of%20the%20Saints/St%20Louis%20de%20Montfort/St%20Louis%20de%20Montfort%20-%20Methods%20of%20Reciting%20the%20Rosary.pdf

Source: https://freecatholicebooks.wordpress.com/

#7

Catholic Resources / Re: Crowdsourced Transcription...

Last post by Geremia - September 18, 2024, 03:54:33 PM

I think New Advent is sourced from CCEL.
See Theological Markup Language (ThML).

#8

Catholic Resources / Crowdsourced Transcriptions

Last post by k42s - September 18, 2024, 12:37:14 PM

Does anyone have experience with online transcription projects of public-domain Catholic texts? Many websites like New Advent, Sensus Fidelium, CatholicSaints.mobi and eCatholic2000 have HTML or EPUB versions of old texts, but the raw sources are not always referenced. I'm aware of two websites that do what I'm referring to:

• Religious Bookshelf, and it's Meditations of St. Alphonsus
• Wikisource, specifically users KSandigo and Bobdole2021 (although the latter deviates from the proofreading protocol)

I'd love to hear of more examples of this (or of more people willing to volunteer), as it brings facsimiles of great Catholic works to a format that's highly readable on web browsers, e-readers and TTS services.

#9

Theology / St. Thomas and conscience

Last post by ptlopes - September 18, 2024, 08:15:55 AM

Hello, everyone!

In his "Beatitude", Garrigou-Lagrange says that conscience, when binding, is called commanding or forbidding conscience. When not binding, it is called permitting or advising conscience.

However, Henri Grenier says in "Thomistic Philosophy" that antecedent conscience "binds" or "incites" and doesn't mention any permitting conscience.

In his textbook about moral philosophy, Charles Coppens writes: "conscience, then, may be defined as a practical judgment formed by reasoning from a universal principle to a particular fact, whereby I decide whether a certain individual act ought to be done or omitted, or whether it may be done or omitted, at my choice." Copper doesn't write about any "advising conscience"

Why do they disagree? Was St. Thomas clear about this?

Thanks and God bless you!

[Mary]

#10

Holy Scripture / Re: Mariam = "star of the sea"...

Last post by Geremia - September 12, 2024, 05:45:05 PM

St. Bernard, in his Second Homily on Luke i. 26 in today's matins, says:

It is said: And the virgin's name was Mary. Let us speak a few words upon this name, which signifieth, being interpreted, Star of the Sea, and suiteth very well the Maiden Mother, who may very meetly be likened unto a star. A star giveth forth her rays without any harm to herself, and the Virgin brought forth her Son without any hurt to her virginity. The light of a star taketh nothing away from the star itself, and the birth of her offspring took nothing away from the Virginity of Mary. She is that noble star which was to come out of Jacob, Num. xxiv. 17, whose brightness still sheddeth lustre upon all the earth, whose rays are most brilliant in heaven, and shine even unto hell, lighting up earth midway, and warming souls rather than bodies, fostering good and scaring away evil. She, I say, is a clear and shining star, twinkling with excellencies, and resplendent with example, needfully set to look down upon the surface of this great and wide sea.