July 09, 2020, 04:02:37 PM

News:

"we needed none of these having for our comfort the holy Books, that are in our hands." --Maccabees 12:9


Is it necessary to read Aristotle's books to understand the Summa?

Started by Geremia, May 31, 2016, 10:36:24 AM

previous topic - next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Go Down

Geremia

This question was asked on Christianity StackExchange. To it, I responded:
QuoteAlthough St. Thomas Aquinas is said to have "reconciled" Aristotle with Christian theology, he rejects much of Aristotle (e.g., he rejects that Aristotle thought the world is eternal).
(Interestingly, St. Thomas refers to Aristotle as "Aristotle" when he disagrees with him and as "The Philosopher" when he agrees with him.)
Understand Scholastic terminology.
St. Thomas can be understood without reading any Aristotle; however, it is necessary to understand the Scholastic terminology he uses. To aid with this, see:
Understand the doctrine of actuality and potentiality.
Philosophically, hylemorphism (the doctrine of actuality and potentiality) forms the basis of Thomism. See:
Reading Aristotle not necessary but could be helpful
If you want to read Aristotle (it certainly doesn't hurt in helping one understand St. Thomas), read the following works by Aristotle alongside St. Thomas's commentaries on them:

Go Up