• Featured in Physics
  • Editors' Suggestion
  • Go Mobile »
  • Access by University of Arizona Library

Single-Electron Detection and Spectroscopy via Relativistic Cyclotron Radiation

D. M. Asner et al. (Project 8 Collaboration)
Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 162501 – Published 20 April 2015
Physics logo See Viewpoint: Cyclotron Radiation from One Electron
×

Abstract

It has been understood since 1897 that accelerating charges must emit electromagnetic radiation. Although first derived in 1904, cyclotron radiation from a single electron orbiting in a magnetic field has never been observed directly. We demonstrate single-electron detection in a novel radio-frequency spectrometer. The relativistic shift in the cyclotron frequency permits a precise electron energy measurement. Precise beta electron spectroscopy from gaseous radiation sources is a key technique in modern efforts to measure the neutrino mass via the tritium decay end point, and this work demonstrates a fundamentally new approach to precision beta spectroscopy for future neutrino mass experiments.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 24 December 2014

DOI:

© 2015 American Physical Society

Viewpoint

Key Image

Cyclotron Radiation from One Electron

Published 20 April 2015

An electron’s energy can be determined with high accuracy by detecting the radiation it emits when moving in a magnetic field.

See more in Physics

Authors & Affiliations

Click to Expand

Article Text

For over a century, nuclear decay electron spectroscopy has played a pivotal role in the understanding of nuclear physics. Early measurements of the continuous β-decay spectrum [1] provided the first evidence of the existence of the weak force and the neutrino [2], and immediately hinted that the neutrino mass is small. Continuing this tradition, present efforts to directly measure the mass of the neutrino rely on precision spectroscopy of the β-decay energy spectrum of H3. Because the value of the neutrino mass is an input to the standard model of particle physics as well as precision cosmology, a precision measurement of the neutrino mass would represent a significant advance in our description of nature.

The sensitivity of H3 -based neutrino mass measurements has been improving over the past 80 years as a result of increasingly powerful electron spectrometry techniques [3–6]. The most sensitive experiments to date place a limit on the electron-flavor-weighted neutrino mass mβ2.05eV/c2 at 95% C.L. [7–9],

mβ2=i=1,2,3|Uei|2mνi2,
(1)

where the mνi are the neutrino eigenmasses and Uei represent the elements of the Maki-Nakagawa-Sakata-Pontecorvo mixing matrix [9]. A future experiment, the Karlsruhe TRItium Neutrino experiment [10], is expected to be sensitive down to mβ0.2eV/c2. The absolute lower bound, which can be derived from the currently known neutrino oscillation parameters [9], is mβ0.01eV/c2.

Since 1897, it has been known that accelerating charges emit electromagnetic radiation [11]. Cyclotron radiation, the particular form of radiation emitted by an electron orbiting in a magnetic field, was first derived in 1904 [12]. Single electrons undergoing cyclotron motion in Penning traps have been previously detected nondestructively via image currents [13], and relativistically shifted cyclotron energy levels have been successfully utilized in precision measurements of the magnetic moment of the electron [14,15]. Yet, cyclotron radiation from single electrons has not been observed directly.

Consider the ideal case where an electron is created in the presence of a uniform magnetic field B. The subsequent orbits of the electron have a cyclotron frequency fγ that depends on the kinetic energy K of the electron,

fγfcγ=eB2πγme,
(2)

where e(me) is the electron charge (mass), c is the speed of light in vacuum, and γ=(1+K/mec2) is the Lorentz factor. The nonrelativistic frequency fc is 2.799249110(6)×1010Hz at 1 T [16]. The orbiting electron emits coherent electromagnetic radiation with a power spectrum that is strongly peaked at fγ. Because of the K dependence of fγ, a frequency measurement of this radiation is related to the energy of the electron, and thus provides a new form of nondestructive spectroscopy.

A frequency-based technique has, in principle, the capability of overcoming many of the limitations imposed by traditional spectroscopic techniques used in direct neutrino mass experiments using tritium. The most sensitive methods in use today suffer from the need to extract the β-decay electron for measurement, imposing a practical limitation on the size and density of the tritium source used. Because the gas is transparent to cyclotron radiation, this limitation does not apply to the cyclotron radiation detection technique. An additional advantage over traditional techniques is provided by simultaneous sensitivity to an entire energy region of interest with event-by-event energy reconstruction, rather than a stepped integrating method. Furthermore, the measurement reconstructs the electron energy spectrum with well-established techniques for measuring frequencies and magnetic fields. Here we demonstrate a technique for electron energy spectroscopy that directly measures the cyclotron radiation from single electrons. This technique, hereafter referred to as cyclotron radiation emission spectroscopy (CRES), could allow a future generation of experiments access to neutrino masses below the sensitivity floor of current experiments [17].

In free space, the total radiated power P is given by the Larmor formula [18],

P(γ,θ)=14πε023e4me2cB2(γ21)sin2θ,
(3)

where ε0 is the permittivity of free space and θ is the pitch angle of the electron, defined as the angle between the momentum vector of the electron and the direction of the magnetic field. For an electron with an energy near the 18.6-keV end point of H3 , approximately 1.2 fW is radiated in a 1-T magnetic field at a pitch angle of 90°.

The Project 8 Collaboration has constructed an experiment designed to detect the cyclotron radiation from single electrons. At the heart of the experiment is a small volume hereafter referred to as the “cell,” in which a gaseous radioactive isotope is present at low pressure. In a uniform magnetic field, electrons from decays inside the cell emit cyclotron radiation. The cell consists of a section of rectangular waveguide sized to capture and transmit the microwave radiation to the input of a low-noise radio-frequency receiver and digitizer.

The radioactive isotope Kr83m is a gamma-emitting isomer of Kr83 with a half-life of 1.8 h, in which internal conversion produces monoenergetic electron lines with kinetic energies of 17 830.0(5), 30 227(1), 30 424(1), 30 477(1), and 31 942(1) eV, with linewidths less than 3 eV [19]. The short-lived Kr83m is supplied at a steady rate by decays of a 74-MBq source of the parent Rb83 with a half-life of 86d, adsorbed onto zeolite beads [20]. The krypton diffuses freely from the zeolite and uniformly fills the experimental system, including the cell, while nonevaporable getter pumps reduce the total pressure of non-noble gases to <10μPa. The Kr83m concentration and flow are monitored by means of a silicon detector that is exposed to the gas system but is outside the cell and magnet.

A magnetic field of approximately 1 T is provided by a 52-mm- diameter warm-bore superconducting solenoid magnet. To allow sufficient time for detection and precise measurement of the emission frequency, a weak magnetic trap is introduced at the midpoint of the cell to confine a small fraction of the produced electrons. A copper coil provides a near-harmonic magnetic field perturbation with a gradient of up to 100Tm2 along the magnetic field axis and a maximum depth of -8.2mT at the trap’s center for an applied current of 2 A. With the strongest trap settings, an electron that is emitted with a pitch angle 85° will be confined until collisions with the residual gas scatter the electron to a lower pitch angle.

The field strength inside the magnet bore is calibrated using both nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and electron spin resonance (ESR). A full NMR map was used to assess the field homogeneity of the background field near the center of the waveguide cell. ESR scans along the axis can be made with the waveguide in place by observing absorption of microwaves by a sample of 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl inside a sealed Pyrex ampoule resting on the upper window of the cell. The field strength at the center of the cell (without the additional trapping coil field) is measured to be 0.9467(1) T. Because of a slow drift in magnetic field and the effect of the trapping coil, the NMR and ESR measurements of the magnetic field were used only to predict the frequency region of interest and the achievable energy resolution.

At this field strength, the fundamental cyclotron signals for the 30.4-keV and 17.8-keV electrons are expected to lie in the microwave K band. Thus, the cell is constructed from a standard WR42 rectangular waveguide section ( 10.7×4.3mm2) coaxial with the solenoidal field. The Kr83m source gas is confined to the 7.6-cm-long cell with 25-μm-thick Kapton windows.

The motion of the electron in the cell couples strongly to the fundamental TE10 mode of the WR42 waveguide, and most of the radiated power is emitted into this mode. The remainder of the power is coupled to higher-order modes, which are nonpropagating at the cyclotron frequency of the electron and are therefore unobservable to the receiver. The cell is coupled to the receiver by a waveguide about 1 m in length. The first stage of the receiver consists of two cascaded 22–40 GHz low-noise preamplifiers that establish a noise floor of 20(5)×1022WHz1 referred to the cell. The gain of this amplifier cascade is 54 dB, making the noise contribution from the components following these amplifiers negligible. The frequency band of interest (from 25 to 27 GHz) is mixed down with a local 24.2 GHz oscillator to a center frequency of 1.8 GHz. A second mixer with a variable local oscillator frequency combines with a low-pass filter to select a frequency subband of 125 MHz for narrow-band signal analysis. Signals are digitized at 250 mega-samples per second with a free-running 8-bit digitizer and recorded to disk. A schematic of the receiver is shown in Figure 1.

+Open in new window

FIG. 1 (color).

A picture of the waveguide insert (left), where both the gas lines and trapping cell can be seen, and a corresponding schematic (right) of the receiver chain, consisting of cascaded cryogenic amplifiers, a high-frequency stage, and a low-frequency stage. Calibrated radio-frequency signals can be injected into the cryogenic receiver and through the WR42 waveguide section. The high-frequency band of interest, with a width of 2 GHz centered at 26 GHz, is then mixed down to be centered at 1.8 GHz with the same 2-GHz bandwidth. A second amplification and mixing stage is used to further amplify the signal and shift the center frequency. Data can be recorded either using an 8-bit digitizer or through a real-time spectrum analyzer (RSA).

The preamplifier performance is strongly dependent on physical temperature, which is reduced to 50 K by a Gifford- McMahon cryocooler. At that physical temperature, an equivalent noise temperature for the system may be derived by comparison with the available noise power from a matched resistor at temperature Te, which is kBTeWHz1. Converting the amplifier noise floor to an available noise power, the noise temperature of the receiver is roughly 145 K. The expected signal-to-noise ratio may be expressed as the ratio P/kBTeΔfγ, where Δfγ is the bandwidth. For an 18-keV electron, the available signal-to-noise ratio is 12 dB for a receiver detection bandwidth of 30 kHz.

The presence of a magnetic trapping field shifts the cyclotron frequency. Approximating the trap as harmonic, the primary signal frequency is

f(t)fcγ(1+cos2θ2sin2θ)(1+Ptγmec2),
(4)

where it can be seen that electrons with pitch angles deviating from θ=90° emit cyclotron radiation at a higher frequency because they explore higher magnetic-field regions of the trap. As the electron radiates energy, the frequency will increase. Additional frequency structure is expected due to the axial and magnetron motion of the electron in the trap, but spectral lines due to this structure are relatively weak and have not yet been observed.

Equation (4) outlines the unique characteristics of a signal from a trapped electron. One expects to find a nearly monochromatic rf signal at a frequency that slowly increases as the electron loses energy at a rate given by the Larmor formula. Electrons that scatter off the gas at small angles may remain confined and continue to radiate power at a frequency determined by the new pitch angle and the energy lost in the collision.

A short-time Fourier transform, with a window size of 8192 samples, is performed on the digitized time series data. The resultant spectrogram has pixels with dimensions of 30.52 kHz by 32.8μs. Bins in the spectrogram that exceed the noise floor by 8.12 dB are then extracted. The resulting reduced set of 2D data is examined for structures which appear linear in the time-frequency plane. Linear segments that are so discovered are then grouped in time into fully reconstructed electron events. With the expected signal-to-noise ratio, random alignments of power fluctuations should not occur.

The events recorded have precisely the characteristics outlined above. Figure 2 shows the signal from a 30-keV electron observed during the first few milliseconds of data collection. The features expected for electron cyclotron emission are clearly evident, including (a) the abrupt onset of narrow-band rf power above the surrounding background, (b) a quasilinear increase in frequency over time as the particle loses energy via cyclotron emission, and (c) sudden shifts in frequency due to gas collisions in which the electron remains magnetically confined.

+Open in new window

FIG. 2 (color).

A typical signal from the decay of Kr83m characterized by an abrupt onset of narrow-band power over the thermal noise of the system. The measured frequency reflects the kinetic energy of the electron, in this case 30 keV. The frequency increases slowly as the electron loses energy by emission of cyclotron radiation, ending in the first of six or possibly seven visible frequency jumps before the electron is ejected from the trap. The frequency-time window shown represents only a portion of an extended event lasting more than 15 ms. The sudden jumps result from the energy loss and pitch-angle changes caused by collisions with the residual gas, predominantly hydrogen. The most probable size of the energy jump, as determined from many events, is 14 eV.

The power spectrum shown in Fig. 2 is normalized to peak signal power. The Larmor prediction for free-space radiative loss at a 90° pitch angle is 1.74 fW. The rate of change of frequency is a direct measure of the power radiated by the electron, and is expected to differ from the free-space prediction because the emitted power must couple into modes of the waveguide. For the electron shown, the rate of change in frequency of the longest duration track is measured to be 1.61(4) fW. The received power, 0.66(16) fW, is 3.9(10) dB below the radiated power owing to radiation into harmonics and axial sidebands and coupling to nonpropagating waveguide modes.

A clear excess of candidate events over background can be seen at 17.8, 30, and 32 keV (see Fig. 3). As a check for backgrounds, data collected with the trap deenergized were also analyzed. No events were identified under those conditions. The ratio of the 30-to 17.8-keV peak frequencies, which is independent of the absolute magnetic field, is measured to be 1.023 870(60), in very good agreement with the expected weighted average peak ratio of 1.023 875(2). The uncertainty in the magnetic field from the 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl measurement corresponds to an absolute energy uncertainty of 60 eV. Alternatively, one can use the 17.8-keV electron emission line to calibrate the mean field probed by the trapped electrons, as has been done for Fig. 3. This calibration method yields a mean magnetic field of 0.9421(3) T, with a relative uncertainty in the energy of about 30 eV, and is currently limited by statistics as well as prior knowledge of the spectral line shape. A fit to the frequency distribution using a skewed Gaussian line shape [21] yields a full width at half maximum (FWHM) of approximately 130 and 140 eV for the 17-and 30-keV emission lines, respectively.

+Open in new window

FIG. 3.

The kinetic energy distribution of conversion electrons from Kr83m as determined by CRES for a trapping current of 800 mA. The spectrum shows the 17-, 32-, and 30-keV complex conversion electron lines. The shaded region indicates the bandwidth where no data were collected. Inset: With the trap current reduced to 400 mA, the feature at 30.4 keV is resolved into 3 lines. Also visible as low-energy shoulders on these lines are shakeup satellites.

Improved energy resolution is expected as the trapping field decreases because pitch-angle spread is reduced [Eq. (4)]. To demonstrate this point, data have been collected with a trapping current of 400 mA ( -1.6mT trapping field) using a real-time spectrum analyzer configured to trigger if the power in a 10-kHz bin exceeded a threshold 2.5 dB above a frequency-dependent noise floor. Each trigger resulted in a 5-ms-long time series of phase-quadrature samples of a 40-MHz bandwidth, including 1 ms prior to the trigger. The center of the bandwidth was alternately chosen such that either the 17- or 30.4-keV krypton emissions, and their associated excitations to higher-energy bound states (shakeup) or to the continuum (shakeoff), would be included [22]. The results, shown in Fig. 3 (inset), illustrate the improvement in resolution, with the 30.4-keV doublet clearly resolved. The resulting FWHM of the 30.4-keV lines is 15 eV, representing an order of magnitude improvement as compared to the 800-mA data.

The fundamental energy resolution achievable with this technique depends on two factors: uncertainty in measuring the emission frequency, and uncertainty in the time at which the emission begins. Because of energy loss to radiation, the frequency is not constant, but increases quasilinearly with time. The precision in the time of onset has a fundamental quantum limit and a practical limit from thermal noise. The inherent resolution will be further broadened according to the sampled field inhomogeneity, which dominates the energy resolution in our harmonic trap.

In summary, cyclotron radiation emission from single, mildly relativistic electrons has been observed experimentally. The observation renders frequency-based measurements of electron kinetic energy, with the advantages of precision and independence from nuclear and atomic standards, a practical approach. An important and promising application for CRES is the measurement of the mass of the neutrino.

Acknowledgements

References

  1. J. Chadwick, Verh. Phys Gesell. 16, 383 (1914).
  2. J. Chadwick, Verh. Phys Gesell. 16, 383 (1914).
  3. E. Fermi, Nuovo Cimento 11, 1 (1934).
  4. E. Fermi, Nuovo Cimento 11, 1 (1934).
  5. D. R. Hamilton, W. P. Alford, and L. Gross, Phys. Rev. 92, 1521 (1953).
  6. D. R. Hamilton, W. P. Alford, and L. Gross, Phys. Rev. 92, 1521 (1953).
  7. K.-E. Bergkvist, Nucl. Phys. B39, 371 (1972).
  8. K.-E. Bergkvist, Nucl. Phys. B39, 371 (1972).
  9. V. Lobashev and P. Spivak, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 240, 305 (1985).
  10. V. Lobashev and P. Spivak, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 240, 305 (1985).
  11. A. Picard et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 63, 345 (1992).
  12. A. Picard et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 63, 345 (1992).
  13. C. Kraus, B. Bornschein, L. Bornschein, J. Bonn, B. Flatt et al., Eur. Phys. J. C 40, 447 (2005).
  14. C. Kraus, B. Bornschein, L. Bornschein, J. Bonn, B. Flatt et al., Eur. Phys. J. C 40, 447 (2005).
  15. V. N. Aseev et al., Phys. Rev. D 84, 112003 (2011).
  16. V. N. Aseev et al., Phys. Rev. D 84, 112003 (2011).
  17. K. A. Olive et al. (Particle Data Group), Chin. Phys. C 38, 090001 (2014).
  18. K. A. Olive et al. (Particle Data Group), Chin. Phys. C 38, 090001 (2014).
  19. J. Angrik et al., FZK Report No. 7090, 2005.
  20. J. Angrik et al., FZK Report No. 7090, 2005.
  21. J. Larmor, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 190, 205 (1897).
  22. J. Larmor, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 190, 205 (1897).
  23. O. Heaviside, Nature (London) 69, 293 (1904).
  24. O. Heaviside, Nature (London) 69, 293 (1904).
  25. R. S. Van Dyck, P. B. Schwinberg, and H. G. Dehmelt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 38, 310 (1977).
  26. R. S. Van Dyck, P. B. Schwinberg, and H. G. Dehmelt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 38, 310 (1977).
  27. R. S. Van Dyck, P. B. Schwinberg, and H. G. Dehmelt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 26 (1987).
  28. R. S. Van Dyck, P. B. Schwinberg, and H. G. Dehmelt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 26 (1987).
  29. D. Hanneke, S. Fogwell, and G. Gabrielse, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 120801 (2008).
  30. D. Hanneke, S. Fogwell, and G. Gabrielse, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 120801 (2008).
  31. P. J. Mohr, B. N. Taylor, and D. B. Newell, Rev. Mod. Phys. 84, 1527 (2012).
  32. P. J. Mohr, B. N. Taylor, and D. B. Newell, Rev. Mod. Phys. 84, 1527 (2012).
  33. B. Monreal and J. A. Formaggio, Phys. Rev. D 80, 051301 (2009).
  34. B. Monreal and J. A. Formaggio, Phys. Rev. D 80, 051301 (2009).
  35. J. D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics, 3rd ed. (Wiley, New York, 1998).
  36. J. D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics, 3rd ed. (Wiley, New York, 1998).
  37. A. Picard et al., Z. Phys. A 342, 71 (1992).
  38. A. Picard et al., Z. Phys. A 342, 71 (1992).
  39. D. Venos, A. Spalek, O. Lebeda, and M. Fiser, Appl. Radiat. Isot. 63, 323 (2005).
  40. D. Venos, A. Spalek, O. Lebeda, and M. Fiser, Appl. Radiat. Isot. 63, 323 (2005).
  41. A. L’Hoir, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. 223, 336 (1984).
  42. A. L’Hoir, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. 223, 336 (1984).
  43. D. Wark et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 2291 (1991).
  44. D. Wark et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 2291 (1991).
Issue

Vol. 114, Iss. 16 — 24 April 2015

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
CHORUS

Article part of CHORUS

General Relativity
2015 - General Relativity’s Centennial

The editors of the Physical Review journals have curated a collection of landmark papers on General Relativity to celebrate its centennial. These papers are currently free to read.

International Year Of Light
The Physical Review Journals Celebrate the International Year of Light

The editors of the Physical Review journals revisit papers that represent important breakthroughs in the field of optics. The articles covered are free to read throughout 2015.

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

2 of 3
×

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

×