No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
Ampèrian recoil and the efficiency of railguns
Abstract
In this paper the mechanical efficiency of the railgun is defined as the force accelerating the armature‐projectile combination divided by the total electrodynamic force generated in the gun. The energy expended in a shot may then be equated to the ohmic loss plus the kinetic energy that would have been developed in the absence of mechanical losses. In this way it can be shown that the overall energy efficiency can never be greater than the square of the mechanical efficiency. Comparing calculations with experimental data makes it clear the reported disappointing performance of railguns is due to some ill‐understood mechanical deficiency. A simple experiment is described which reveals buckling and distortion of the rails by recoil action. This explains the mechanical inefficiency. In relativistic electromagnetism, the recoil force should act ‘‘on the magnetic field’’ and absorb field‐energy momentum. The Ampère–Neumann electrodynamics, on the other hand, requires the recoil forces to reside in the railheads and push the rails back toward the gun breech. Experiment confirmed the latter mechanism.
© 1987 American Institute of Physics
Received 02 settembre 1986
Accepted 04 giugno 1987
/content/aip/journal/jap/62/7/10.1063/1.339388
1.
1.H. Kolm and P. Mongeau, IEEE Spectrum 19, 30 (1982).
2.
2.V. N. Bondaletov, Soviet Physics Technology 12, No. 2 (1967).
3.
3.R. Azevedo, P. Graneau, N. Graneau, and C. Millet, Phys. Lett. A 117, 101 (1986).
4.
4.D. W. Deis, D. W. Scherbarth, and G. L. Ferrentino, IEEE Trans. Magn. MAG‐20, 245 (1984).
5.
5.P. Graneau, Ampere‐Neumann Electrodynamics of Metals, (Hadronic, Nonantum, MA 1985).
6.
6.P. T. Pappas, Nuovo Cimento 76B, 189 (1983).
7.
7.T. E. Phipps, Found. Phys. 17, 316 (1987).
8.
8.P. Graneau, J. Phys. D 20, 391 (1987).
9.
9.P. Graneau, J. Appl. Phys. 53, 6648 (1982).
10.
10.A. J. Bedford, IEEE Trans. Magn. MAG‐20, 348 (1984).
11.
11.D. R. Peterson, C. M. Fowler, C. E. Cummings, J. F. Kerrisk, J. V. Parker, S. P. Marsh, and D. F. Adams, IEEE Trans. Magn. MAG‐20, 252 (1984).
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/jap/62/7/10.1063/1.339388
Article metrics loading...
/content/aip/journal/jap/62/7/10.1063/1.339388
1987-10-01
2015-10-13
Most read this month
Article
content/aip/journal/jap
Journal
5
3
true
Commenting has been disabled for this content