  | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
| Journal Home | |
| Current Issue | |
| AOP | |
| Archive | |
| |
| |
THIS ARTICLE  | |
| |
| Download PDF | |
| References | |
| |
| |
| |
| Export citation | |
| Export references | |
| |
| |
| |
| Send to a friend | |
| |
| |
| |
| More articles like this | |
| |
| |
| |
| Table of Contents | |
| < Previous | Next > | |
| |
 |
 |
| Nature 299, 802 - 803 (28 October 1982); doi:10.1038/299802a0 |
|
A single quantum cannot be cloned
W. K. Wootters*1 & W. H. Zurek2
1Center for Theoretical Physics, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, USA
2Theoretical Astrophysics 130–33, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, USA
*Present address: Department of Physics and Astronomy, Williams College, Williamstown, Massachusetts 01267, USA.
If a photon of definite polarization encounters an excited atom, there is typically some nonvanishing probability that the atom will emit a second photon by stimulated emission. Such a photon is guaranteed to have the same polarization as the original photon. But is it possible by this or any other process to amplify a quantum state, that is, to produce several copies of a quantum system (the polarized photon in the present case) each having the same state as the original? If it were, the amplifying process could be used to ascertain the exact state of a quantum system: in the case of a photon, one could determine its polarization by first producing a beam of identically polarized copies and then measuring the Stokes parameters1. We show here that the linearity of quantum mechanics forbids such replication and that this conclusion holds for all quantum systems.
| 1. | Born, M. & Wolf, E. Principles of Optics 4th edn (Pergamon, New York, 1970). |
| 2. | Herbert, N. Found. Phys. (in the press). |
| 3. | Einstein, A., Podolsky, B. & Rosen, N. Phys. Rev. 47, 777−780 (1935). | Article | ChemPort | |
| 4. | Bohm, D. Quantum Theory, 611−623 (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1951). |
| 5. | Kocher, C. A. & Commins, E. D. Phys. Rev. Lett. 18, 575−578 (1967). | Article | ISI | ChemPort | |
| 6. | Freedman, S. J. & Clauser, J. R. Phys. Rev. Lett. 28, 938−941 (1972). | Article | ISI | ChemPort | |
| 7. | Fry, E. S. & Thompson, R. C. Phys. Rev. Lett. 37, 465−468 (1976). | Article | ISI | ChemPort | |
| 8. | Aspect, A., Grangier, P. & Roger, G. Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 460−463 (1981). | Article | ISI | ChemPort | |
| 9. | Bussey, P. J. Phys. Lett. 90A, 9−12 (1982). | Article | ISI | |
| 10. | Haus, H. A. & Mullen, J. A. Phys. Rev. 128, 2407−2410 (1962). | Article | ISI | |
| 11. | Caves, C. M. Phys. Rev. D15, (in the press). |
| 12. | Gozzini, A. Proc. Symp. on Wave−Particle Dualism (eds Diner, S., Fargue, D., Lochak, G. & Selleri, F) (Reidel, Dordrecht, in the press). |
© 1982 Nature Publishing Group
Privacy Policy
