TrapCast Express
TrapCast Express, it's Thursday, March 8th, 2018.
Listen to this headline found on the website of the UK-based Tablet today.
Pope donates 100,000 euros, 90,000 pounds, towards the First Orthodox Monastery in Austria.
100,000 euros, that's 123,000 US dollars.
So Francis has made a donation of that amount to benefit the monastery of a false religion.
And there you can see in practice the ecumenism of Vatican II.
This is the kind of thing.
You need to recall when the Novus Ordo apologists claim that the Second Vatican Council didn't really teach any new doctrines,
that nothing has really changed, that ecumenism isn't against the pre-Vatican II teaching,
that dissidents are trying to hijack the council, etc.
Baloney!
Or are we supposed to believe that the Pope himself doesn't understand the council, the true council?
And where are all those conservatives?
And where are all those conservative theologians condemning this?
Vatican II ecumenism denies the dogma of the church's uniqueness as the only ark of salvation
and the necessity of being inside the Catholic Church to be saved.
But this is dogma, folks.
It cannot be denied without committing heresy.
Now let me quote a little from the story found in the Tablet.
Referring to the president of the so-called Pontifical Council,
for promoting Christian unity, Cardinal Kurt Koch.
The Tablet writes, quote,
Koch recalled that Pope Francis had supported the monastery project from its very beginnings
and had in his turn recalled that Pope John Paul II had underlined the importance of Austria's easternmost diocese's bridge-building function
between the people of eastern and western Europe.
May the Pope's building block, the donation,
incite many others to participate in the construction of this first Orthodox monastery in Austria
through their prayers or material help, Koch said.
Unquote.
So not only does Francis make a donation that is presented by his chief ecumenist to further a false religion,
the latter also explicitly and directly incites others to follow suit.
Giving money to directly benefit a false religion is a must.
A mortal sin.
I don't know if it can be considered strictly heretical, a strictly heretical act by itself,
but it certainly would make one at least suspect of heresy.
And that stands to reason, of course.
The Orthodox, by the way, have been living Amoris Laetitia for a long time.
Yep, the Eastern schismatics permit you to trade in your spouse for a new one
if you show buyer's remorse at some point.
But only, I think, up to two or three times.
Well, of course, anything above and beyond that would obviously be, you know, adultery or something.
Our Lord Jesus Christ founded only one religion, one church,
and that church is the Roman Catholic Church,
as it was known until the death of Pope Pius XII.
Therefore, supporting any other religion means to help oppose the religion revealed and founded by God himself.
And this is a sin that you do not want to have to answer for when God calls you to judgment.
In other news, the Church of Mercy, Tenderness, and Encounter is trying to shut down a news portal
that has been severely critical of Francis.
The website in question is the Spanish-speaking InfoVaticana.com.
According to veteran Vatican journalist Marco Tosati, as well as InfoVaticana,
the Vatican says,
the Secretariat of State has contracted the prestigious multinational law firm Baker McKenzie
to get that pesky Spanish news portal shut down
and the domain name InfoVaticana.com seized by the unholy sea.
InfoVaticana was given an ultimatum of seven days,
which has since been generously extended to six months.
What is the reason?
On what grounds does the Vatican claim it has the right to do this?
Well, the modernists in Rome,
Rome say that they alone have the right to the name Vatican.
Now, that's ridiculous, of course,
not only because they are the ones that are illegitimately occupying the Holy See to begin with,
but also because the idea leads to absurdity.
Think about what consequences this logic would have.
Federal Express can't call itself that anymore because it's not part of the federal government.
The New York Times runs into problems with the state or the city of New York.
Because it's using the same name?
Could a magazine about life in Italy not call itself Italian Living unless the nation of Italy agrees?
The case is preposterous.
InfoVaticana calls itself that because it presents information about the Vatican.
Kind of like La Stampa's Vatican Insider at VaticanInsider.com.
Are they going to have to close up shop now, too?
Fat chance.
No.
Of course, we all know what the real reason is for this tyranny.
The Secretariat of State of the Modernist Vatican isn't concerned about InfoVaticana
because it's got the name Vatican in its title,
but because it's not been fawning over Francis,
but has exposed many of the, shall we say, more unflattering news about him.
Unlike Vatican Insider, where the Francis admirer Andrea Tornielli is the star columnist.
I guess it remains to be seen.
If the Vatican also claims exclusive rights to the term Novus Ordo.
Tradcast Express is a production of Novus Ordo Watch.
Check us out at tradcast.org.
And if you like what we're doing, please consider making a tax-deductible contribution at novusordowatch.org.
Slash donate.