TrapCast Express
TrapCast Express, it's Monday, March 11th, 2019.
Francis has called the world to conversion.
Yep, he did.
Of course, we're talking about ecological conversion,
since he doesn't give a hoot about what your religion is,
as long as it's not Roman Catholicism.
On March 8th, the Frankster gave an address to the International Conference
Religions and the Sustainable Development Goals,
which was taking place in the Vatican.
Hey, remember when Vatican conferences were about Catholicism?
Yeah, that was a long time ago.
Anyway, among many other things, Francis had this to say, quote,
Already, St. John Paul II spoke about the need to
encourage and support the Catholic Church
to support the ecological conversion.
This word is powerful, ecological conversion.
Religions have a key role to play in this.
For a correct shift towards a sustainable future,
we must recognize our errors, sins, faults, and failures,
which leads to a heartfelt repentance and desire to change.
In this way, we will be reconciled with others,
with creation, and with the Creator.
Unquote.
So, if you needed any more evidence that their environmentalism is a religion,
there it is.
Shortly after, Francis proclaimed, quote,
Yeah, well, I know.
Love of God is totally overrated.
Oh yeah, speaking of which, the words God, Jesus, or Divine
do not appear in the Bible.
They appear in the address at all, which is kind of good, actually,
because they would have been mightily out of place.
At the same time, Francis did speak of the sacredness of the earth.
In other news, the pseudo-traditionalist rhetorician Steve Skojak of 1 Peter 5
has stated in a recent blog post, quote,
If we can't trust the Church to tell us who the Pope is when papal elections are
so closely related to dogma, namely, that the man-elected Pope is the successor of St. Peter
with all the power and authority appurtenant to that office,
then we can't trust the Church on anything.
Unquote.
Now, this is funny, considering that the Church he is referring to
is the Novus Ordo sect, which has given to the world Vatican II,
the new Mass and new sacraments, the 1983 Code of Canon Law,
which permits Protestants to receive communion under certain circumstances,
it has given to the world John Paul II's Theology of the Body,
the Assisi Interfaith Prayer Meetings,
World Youth Days,
the False Divine Mercy Devotion,
the destruction of Catholic confessional states
by forcing them to adopt Vatican II's Religious Liberty Doctrine,
the impious 1993 Directory for the Application of Principles and Norms on Ecumenism,
which permits Catholic liturgical items to be used in Protestant worship,
and, quote,
the 2007 Motu Proprio Summorum Pontificum,
which declares that the Novus Ordo worship service and the traditional Latin Mass
are but two expressions of the same rite of Mass, and so on.
That's the Church we're talking about.
Well, it's the Church Skojek is talking about.
And I mean, yeah, why wouldn't you trust that Church to tell you who the Vicar of Christ is, right?
So, in other words, if we can't believe that this blaspheming, maniacal, apostate,
that leads souls to hell by his very teachings, laws, and canonizations
is the Vicar of Christ that has the divine promises,
well, what can we believe?
You know, I am so tired of these supposed traditional or conservative Catholic bloggers
bringing up theological concepts whenever it's convenient for them,
but at other times simply ignoring Catholic theology because it doesn't agree with their position.
As is so often the case,
the truth is the exact opposite of what Mr. Skojek is proclaiming.
If the Catholic Church did require us to believe
that the apostate Jesuit Jorge Bergoglio is the Vicar of Christ,
then the Church could not be trusted.
And this is easy to see once you actually examine what the Catholic Church teaches about the papacy.
Just read the Dogmatic Constitution, Pastor Aeternus, from the First Vatican Council sometime.
It's not long.
You can read it in one sentence.
And every time the phrase Roman Pontiff appears,
substitute in your mind Pope Francis, okay, and see how it reads.
It's absolutely absurd, nuts, to think that that man could be the Pope of the Catholic Church
once you understand what that means, what it means to be the Pope of the Catholic Church.
And by the way, we've already done that for you.
We've long had a post-up that takes Pastor Aeternus
and puts Bergoglio...
Bergoglio's name for every time Roman Pontiff appears.
And you can access that post by going to our blog at
and looking for the post entitled
The easiest way to do that, to find that post,
is to locate the search box on the right towards the top
and searching for
Well, I'll bring it right up.
The post is dated July 4th, 2017.
So yeah, if you believe Francis is the Pope, then do it.
Take that challenge.
See, people don't seem to understand what it means to say that someone is the Pope.
It's not just a title.
There are real consequences to someone being the Pope.
Most serious consequences.
And no,
it's not just about the infallibility of rare ex cathedra statements.
There's a lot more to the papacy than the infallibility of dogmatic pronouncements.
So, take a look at that post.
If you think Francis is the Pope,
then this should not be a problem for you.
And when you've done that,
then you'll realize that you cannot do
what Christopher Ferreira of the Remnant keeps doing.
He's called Francis an undertaker Pope.
He's called him an anti-Catholic.
And in one of his recent Fatima Perspectives,
number 1282 at Fatima.org,
he called Francis a modernist Pope.
Ferreira can do that because ultimately,
let's face it,
he doesn't believe in the papacy.
See, we Sedevacanus believe in the papacy.
We don't believe there is currently a reigning Pope,
but we do believe in the papacy,
in the office.
Okay?
We just don't think there's anybody
filling that office currently.
And because we believe in the papacy,
we know that a Pope cannot be a modernist.
And a modernist cannot be Pope.
So, again, read Pastor Eternus.
The whole document makes no sense anymore
if you assume that a Pope can be a modernist
or some other kind of heretic or anti-Catholic.
Now, in his very latest installment,
number 1283,
Ferreira explicitly states
that Francis has, quote,
That, too, is not a problem for him to say
because, once again,
Ferreira doesn't believe in the papacy.
He believes Bergoglio is Pope,
but he doesn't believe that being Pope means anything.
And so, ladies and gentlemen,
you have a choice.
You either believe Francis is Pope
or you believe in the papacy.
Choose wisely.
Tradcast Express is a production of Novos Ordo Watch.
Check us out at tradcast.org.
And if you like what we're doing,
please consider making a tax-deductible contribution
at novosortowatch.org slash donate.
Thank you.