TrapCast Express
TrapCast Express, it's Saturday, March 6th, 2021.
The Jesuit apostate Jorge Bergoglio is currently visiting the Republic of Iraq.
Today he visited the Plain of Orr for an interreligious encounter
with adherents of what he calls the Abrahamic religions.
You know, as though Abraham were the father of multiple different creeds.
Francis' address was filled with lies and half-truths,
but we're not going to talk about that in this podcast because, honestly,
I'm still busy writing a blog post on it.
And that should be up at Novos Ordo Watch no later than Monday.
Now, before Francis' trip to Iraq, a Syrian monk by the name
of Francis de Moura, who was a Christian,
of Father Jacques Mourad, claimed that Francis was going to Iraq
to bring Jesus Christ to the people there.
Yeah, I don't think I'm revealing too much if I tell you right now
that not one word was said about our blessed Lord at the interreligious encounter.
Anyway, in a March 4th report published by Fides,
the information service of the Pontifical Mission Societies,
Father Mourad is quoted as saying,
Now, that is false on a number of levels.
First, Francis isn't in Iraq to preach Jesus Christ to Muslims.
The nation is 98% Muslim, by the way.
But,
to bring them the Masonic ideas of human fraternity,
human rights, dignity, dialogue, and all that.
Most of all, he is bringing them the lie that we all believe in
and worship the same God, the God of Abraham.
Secondly, Christ's love is not unconditional.
Well, it is in one sense, and in one sense only.
And that is in the sense that he offered himself for our redemption
while we were here.
God's love is unconditional.
Yes, in that sense only, God's love is unconditional.
But, of course, that's something Francis never explains, right?
Or any of these other modernists that love to talk about how God's love is unconditional.
God's love is not unconditional in the sense that no matter what you do,
God will always forgive.
God will never be angry.
God will never punish.
and in the end you go to heaven because, oh, the love. No. And yet that is precisely what Francis
suggests by his constant harping on God's unconditional love. Thirdly, it's false and
probably heretical to say that everyone has the desire for Christ in his heart. It sounds very
much like a denial of original sin or of its consequences. And of course, it's just absurd
on the face of it. I mean, are we supposed to believe that some Islamic terrorist bombing
churches has desire for Christ in his heart? Hello? But then it seems that that's precisely
what Father Murad believes because he also says that by living in humble poverty among Muslims,
quote, we also cultivate the expectation that Jesus is present in Muslims.
Unquote. Now, by saying that, he's really just echoing Francis, who said in Bangladesh in 2017
that the Muslim Rohingya refugees are an instance of the presence of God today. That is the precise
phrase he used, the presence of God today. Now, if we were to challenge that, of course,
the response we would get is that this is just the teaching of Matthew 25, right, where Christ said,
whatever you do, you will be saved. And so, he's really just echoing Francis, who said that by
saying, whatever you did to the least of my brethren, you did to me. See? There. Christ
considers the poor to be himself. Yes, that is true in a certain sense, but that's not what
Father Murad was talking about. He didn't say Jesus is present in the poor. He said he is present
in Muslims. And although our Lord said, yes, that I was hungry and you gave me to eat, I was thirsty,
and you gave me to drink, I was sick, and you visited me, etc., he did not say, I was an unbeliever
and you helped me, or I was an idolater and you cared for me. Now, don't misunderstand. I'm not
saying that we shouldn't help poor people if they're Muslim. I'm not saying that. Of course,
we should. I'm saying that it's nonsense to say that Christ is present in Muslims.
What is that supposed to mean anyway?
I mean, concretely, he's not there in terms of sanctifying grace. That's for sure. I mean,
Muslims aren't even baptized. They're supernaturally dead, as is any even Catholic
in the state of mortal sin. So Christ is not supernaturally present in a Muslim, and that
would only leave a natural presence. But Christ is certainly not naturally present in a Muslim
either. It's true that Christ became
incarnate.
That he took on a human nature and so became our brother. But that doesn't mean that he is
present in each human being. To say otherwise is naturalism. And by the way, if Christ were
present in Muslims and in all people, then why is Francis going to Iraq to bring him to them,
Father Murad? Now, switching gears for a minute, here's a headline that appeared on the
Catholic News.
The Catholic News.
World Report on March 4th. Cardinal Grech to Irish bishops. A synodal process promises an
ecclesial springtime. Look, if there's one thing they don't need in the Novus Ordo, it's yet another
new springtime in the faith. Okay, I mean, they're still recovering from the prior one.
And for those who don't know, I'm talking about Vatican II, that new Pentecost, new springtime,
the Great Renewal, and all these monikers that they came up with. In actual fact, of course,
instead of a genuine renewal of Catholic faith and practice, what they got once the initial
excitement wore off was a more or less gradual descent into nothing short of apostasy. And that's
obvious, okay? People lost the faith left and right. The true faith was replaced by a counterfeit,
sacrifice of the mass became a banal liturgical meal. Infant baptisms went down. Marriages went
down. I think the only thing that actually went up was annulments. Boy, did they. Confession was
discouraged and turned into more of a psychological counseling session. All awareness of the seriousness
of sin was lost. So-called social justice causes were introduced. The supernatural was replaced by
the natural. God was dethroned. The supernatural was replaced by the natural. God was dethroned.
And man was placed at the center instead. But all of that isn't enough yet for this new cardinal
from Malta, Mario Grech, because he now wants another one of those rotten springtimes.
Addressing the Novels Ordo Bishops of Ireland, Mr. Grech said,
quote, a synodal process promises an ecclesial springtime, a rebirth of an authentic church,
unquote.
Okay, so note well, ladies and gentlemen, he just acknowledged that his church is fake. I mean,
why else would he need an authentic church to be reborn, right? And so according to him,
this authentic church is going to be the fruit of the synodal process, which is basically a bunch
of Novels Ordo Bishops meeting up to discern together what the spirit is saying. Look, I have
no doubt that the church is fake. I mean, why else would he need an authentic church to be reborn?
That is going to result in an authentic something or other, but it's not going to be an authentic
church. The only authentic church was founded by our blessed Lord and Savior Jesus Christ
2,000 years ago, and Club Francis isn't it. Meanwhile, the chief Novels Ordo Bishop in
Germany, the land of Martin Luther, has put his foot down about intercommunion between Novels
Ordos and Lutherans. Listen to this from a report by a Catholic news agency dated March 3rd.
Quote, a leading German Catholic bishop has cautioned priests against intercommunion with
Protestants during an ecumenical event in May. Bishop Georg Betzing of Limburg said in a March
1st letter to clergy that they should only give Holy Communion to non-Catholic individuals if
they were to be reconciled with the Catholic Church. So, what does that mean? Well, it means that
they should only give Holy Communion to non-Catholic individuals if they were to be reconciled with
the Catholic Church. So, what does that mean? Well, it means that they should only give Holy
Communion to non-Catholic individuals if they were to be reconciled with the Catholic Church. So,
after examining their consciences, unquote, tough guy, huh? He explains, quote,
the prerequisite for a worthy reception of the Eucharistic gifts for both Catholics and
non-Catholics is the examination of one's conscience, unquote. No, the absolute minimum
for a non-Catholic is to be reconciled with the Catholic Church. So, what does that mean? Well,
the prerequisite for a worthy reception of Holy Communion is the state of sanctifying grace,
doofus. And, of course, non-Catholics are never permitted to receive Holy Communion in the real
Catholic Church, that is. It is permitted, indeed, in the Novus Ordo sect, and that is in their canon
law and in the fake magisterium of John Paul II. And you can look this up yourself. It's
canon 844, paragraphs 3 and 4 of the 1983 Code of Canon Law, as well as in canon 671,
paragraphs 3 and 4 of the 1990 Code of Canons for the Eastern Churches. And you can also find it in
John Paul's encyclical Ecclesia de Eucharistia, number 45. Furthermore, it is found in the
1993 Directory for the Application of Principles and Norms on Ecumenism, paragraphs 129 through 131.
Yeah, that's Saint John Paul II for you. All right, one more. We're going to go back to the
Frankster. Headline on Catholic World Report on March 2nd, Pope Francis, World Could Face a New
Great Flood.
Now, when I first read that, I thought, oh, wow, you mean he actually believes in the first one?
But then when you read the article, he kind of waffles on it. The report says,
quote, he noted that experts regarded the flood as a mythical story. He stressed that he did not
wish to be misquoted as saying that the Bible is a myth, but suggested that myth was a form
of knowledge. The flood is a historical account, archaeologists say, because,
they found evidence of a flood in their excavations, he said, unquote. Well, that's nice.
So, Francis is willing to concede that the deluge actually happened, not because God himself says
so, but because archaeologists tell him so. You see, that's always a good way to proceed, right?
Is this account in scripture a myth or not? Hmm, let's see what the archaeologists have to say
about it.
Now, of course, we're going to go back to the book of Acts, and we're going to go back to the book of
Acts, and we're going to go back to the book of Acts, and we're going to go back to the book of Acts,
God himself promised that he would never again punish the world with a great flood like that.
In Genesis 9-11, God told Noah, quote,
So, why is Francis even bringing up this idea of a new flood?
Does he think God is going to punish the world with a great flood like that?
Does he think God will break his promise because he's so sick and tired of all the apostasy,
the greed and envy, the impurity, the hatred, and the bloodshed in the world?
Oh, wait, let me rephrase that in Bergoglio-friendly terms. Does he think God will break his promise
because he's so sick and tired of all the gossip, the unemployment, the rigidity, the disunity among
religions, the refusal to encounter others, and the walls being put up instead of bridges?
Oh, no. No. Francis is concerned that there may be a new flood because of climate change.
You know, some people are their own best parody.
Tradcast Express is a production of Novus Ordo Watch. Check us out at tradcast.org,
and if you like what we're doing, please consider making a tax-deductible contribution
at novusortowatch.org slash donate.
Thank you.