[ 0 → 4] TrapCast Express [ 4 → 15] TrapCast Express, it's Wednesday, January 30th, 2019. [ 15 → 18] Man, the guy just doesn't ever shut up. [ 19 → 21] You know who I'm talking about, of course. [ 21 → 27] Jorge Bergoglio, the man who claims to be the Pope of the Catholic Church, [ 27 → 34] but is in fact an anti-Catholic infiltrator who spreads the doctrines of Freemasonry and Communism. [ 34 → 39] This past Sunday, he flew back from his World Youth Day Blather Tour in Panama, [ 40 → 45] and of course he had to give another one of those notorious in-flight press conferences. [ 45 → 50] At one point, he was asked whether he might permit married men to be ordained priests, [ 50 → 56] and the answer he gave deserves highlighting because it is officially a no, [ 57 → 62] yet at the same time, it includes within it the very principle for permitting it. [ 63 → 64] Here's what he said, quote, [ 64 → 68] I don't agree to allow optional celibacy, no. [ 69 → 73] It would only be a possibility in very remote posts. [ 73 → 75] I'm thinking of the islands of the Pacific. [ 76 → 82] When there is pastoral need, the pastor must think of the faithful, unquote. [ 82 → 86] And there, even though he technically says no, [ 87 → 91] opened the floodgates to making priestly celibacy optional [ 91 → 94] by introducing the principle of pastoral need. [ 95 → 99] In other words, even though he said no, he really said yes, [ 100 → 103] because all it takes now is sufficient pastoral need, [ 103 → 107] and there will be your married Novus Ordo priests. [ 107 → 110] And of course, it keeps going from there. [ 110 → 114] If pastoral need can justify removing the celibacy requirement for priests, [ 115 → 116] why should not some other... [ 117 → 119] Another suitable criterion also suffice. [ 119 → 123] Why should only pastoral need be the deciding factor? [ 124 → 127] In the end, Francis, or perhaps one of his successors, [ 128 → 131] depending on how long God will permit this comedy show to go on, [ 132 → 139] in the end, the so-called Pope will simply let the national or regional bishops' conferences decide the matter, [ 139 → 143] and then they can make their own decisions on a case-by-case basis, [ 143 → 146] just as with communion for unrepentant adorers. [ 147 → 152] Folks, they've been playing this game for decades, since Vatican II. [ 153 → 157] So, just be aware to watch for these subversive tactics. [ 157 → 160] Francis officially said no, but in principle, [ 161 → 164] he's already granted permission to make celibacy optional. [ 165 → 170] Now, it's just a matter of time and of defining pastoral need. [ 171 → 173] Do what you feel. [ 173 → 175] Feel what you think. [ 175 → 176] Think about what you do. [ 177 → 182] That, too, was said by Francis during his press conference aboard Airhead 1, [ 182 → 186] and I think we can just leave it at that, because we really need to move on. [ 187 → 190] While the Francis show was going on in Panama, [ 190 → 194] the Vatican released a message from Francis for the World Day of Communications, [ 194 → 196] and boy, it is a doozy. [ 197 → 199] In fact, why don't we play a quick game? [ 199 → 204] I'll read the first part of the first sentence, and you try to finish it in your mind, okay? [ 205 → 206] So, just ask yourself, [ 207 → 210] how you, as a Catholic, would finish that sentence. [ 211 → 213] And then I'll tell you how Francis finished it. [ 213 → 214] Here we go. [ 215 → 218] Ever since the Internet first became available, [ 219 → 224] the Church has always sought to promote its use in the service of... [ 224 → 225] Huh? [ 226 → 227] What would you say? [ 227 → 229] In the service of what? [ 229 → 230] Or whom? [ 230 → 232] In the service of the Lord? [ 232 → 233] The Gospel? [ 233 → 235] The salvation of souls? [ 235 → 236] Of course. [ 236 → 237] Of course not. [ 238 → 239] Not for Jorge Bergoglio. [ 240 → 241] Here is what he said. [ 241 → 242] Quote, [ 242 → 245] Ever since the Internet first became available, [ 246 → 250] the Church has always sought to promote its use in the service of... [ 251 → 256] the encounter between persons and of solidarity among all. [ 257 → 257] Unquote. [ 260 → 263] Well, Francis is a naturalist. [ 263 → 265] If you still expect Catholicism from this man, [ 265 → 268] I'm sorry, but the joke's on you. [ 269 → 272] By the way, when he was in Panama, [ 272 → 277] Francis said the following to the Novus Ordo bishops of Central America. [ 277 → 278] Quote, [ 278 → 283] Even in the Catholic media, there is a lack of compassion. [ 283 → 289] There is schism, condemnation, cruelty, exaggerated self-praise, [ 289 → 291] the denouncing of heresy. [ 292 → 293] Unquote. [ 293 → 293] Unquote. [ 295 → 295] Yeah. [ 295 → 297] I mean, don't you hate it when that happens? [ 299 → 305] Really, this guy is so obviously not a valid Pope that it defies belief [ 305 → 310] that there is still any thinking person out there who would consider himself a Catholic [ 310 → 315] and cannot see that this man, Jorge Bergoglio, is indeed a lot of things, [ 316 → 319] but Pope of the Catholic Church isn't one of them. [ 320 → 321] All right. [ 321 → 325] I can't dwell on this because there's much more to cover. [ 325 → 330] Yesterday, Francis delivered an address to the Tribunal of the Roman Rota, [ 330 → 334] which is basically a Vatican court that deals with marriage issues, [ 335 → 337] you know, annulments, that kind of thing. [ 337 → 338] Here's what he said. [ 338 → 339] Quote, [ 339 → 345] So as to be validly contract that marriage requires of each of the betrothed [ 345 → 348] a full unity and harmony with the other, [ 348 → 355] so that through the mutual exchange of their respective human, moral, and spiritual riches, [ 355 → 355] almost all of them will be able to live in harmony with each other. [ 355 → 358] Almost by way of communicating vessels, [ 358 → 362] the two spouses become a single entity. [ 362 → 363] Unquote. [ 364 → 365] False. [ 366 → 369] Unity and harmony with one another, whatever that even means, [ 370 → 374] is not required to contract a valid marriage. [ 374 → 376] But look at what he's doing here. [ 376 → 381] He's using flowery language to introduce a destructive principle [ 381 → 385] that can then be used, and you better believe it will be used, [ 385 → 385] and that would be the case, [ 385 → 391] that can then be used to grant annulments and ruin more marriages and families. [ 392 → 394] He is such a little devil. [ 395 → 397] And later in the same address, he says, [ 397 → 397] Quote, [ 397 → 409] Unquote. [ 411 → 415] No, actually, Frankie, it's not bad that good marriage is bad. [ 415 → 416] Just don't make the news. [ 416 → 417] You know why? [ 418 → 420] Because that would mean it's a rare thing. [ 421 → 422] That would mean it's special. [ 422 → 425] It's not commonplace, and therefore newsworthy. [ 426 → 432] You see, news by its very nature does not concern itself with things going the way they should, [ 432 → 434] the way they normally do. [ 434 → 435] That would be absurd. [ 436 → 439] When you look at the news, you don't want to hear that all trains ran on time today, [ 439 → 444] that no plane has crashed, that the banks have money, and the restaurants are serving food. [ 445 → 450] But notice how once again, Jorge Bergoglio is being a devil. [ 451 → 455] See, here he's pretending that he's sad about separations and divorce [ 455 → 462] when he just proposed a subversive principle to allow for more marriages to be declared null. [ 464 → 467] All right, one more news item before we have to go. [ 467 → 473] Today, at his general audience, Francis reflected a little on his World Youth Day experience, [ 473 → 475] and of course he had to find a way. [ 475 → 478] To make a political statement, here's what he said. [ 479 → 479] Quote, [ 503 → 504] Unquote. [ 505 → 506] Yeah. [ 507 → 513] Says the man who is the head of the smallest nation on earth that has gigantic walls around it [ 513 → 515] and who is himself surrounded by bodyguards. [ 516 → 517] Well, that's just amusing. [ 518 → 523] And of course we all know that people would no longer be able to travel to different countries [ 523 → 527] and meet one another if laws against illegal immigration were enforced, right? [ 528 → 532] Heaven forbid we should have nations and define borders. [ 532 → 535] How will the Antichrist ever be able to govern? [ 535 → 542] I mean, wouldn't it be easier to just get rid of countries and borders altogether? [ 543 → 551] And now you know the real reason why Jorge Bergoglio opposes nations and walls. [ 552 → 555] Tradcast Express is a production of Novos Ordo Watch. [ 555 → 557] Check us out at tradcast.org. [ 557 → 561] And if you like what we're doing, please consider making a tax-deductible contribution [ 561 → 565] at novosordowatch.org slash donate. [ 565 → 566] Novos Ordo Watch.