[ 0 → 4] TrapCast Express [ 4 → 14] TrapCast Express, it's Saturday, March 6th, 2021. [ 15 → 21] The Jesuit apostate Jorge Bergoglio is currently visiting the Republic of Iraq. [ 21 → 26] Today he visited the Plain of Orr for an interreligious encounter [ 26 → 30] with adherents of what he calls the Abrahamic religions. [ 31 → 35] You know, as though Abraham were the father of multiple different creeds. [ 36 → 40] Francis' address was filled with lies and half-truths, [ 40 → 43] but we're not going to talk about that in this podcast because, honestly, [ 44 → 47] I'm still busy writing a blog post on it. [ 47 → 51] And that should be up at Novos Ordo Watch no later than Monday. [ 51 → 56] Now, before Francis' trip to Iraq, a Syrian monk by the name [ 56 → 56] of Francis de Moura, who was a Christian, [ 56 → 61] of Father Jacques Mourad, claimed that Francis was going to Iraq [ 61 → 65] to bring Jesus Christ to the people there. [ 66 → 69] Yeah, I don't think I'm revealing too much if I tell you right now [ 69 → 75] that not one word was said about our blessed Lord at the interreligious encounter. [ 75 → 79] Anyway, in a March 4th report published by Fides, [ 79 → 83] the information service of the Pontifical Mission Societies, [ 83 → 86] Father Mourad is quoted as saying, [ 86 → 106] Now, that is false on a number of levels. [ 107 → 112] First, Francis isn't in Iraq to preach Jesus Christ to Muslims. [ 112 → 114] The nation is 98% Muslim, by the way. [ 115 → 115] But, [ 115 → 120] to bring them the Masonic ideas of human fraternity, [ 120 → 123] human rights, dignity, dialogue, and all that. [ 124 → 128] Most of all, he is bringing them the lie that we all believe in [ 128 → 131] and worship the same God, the God of Abraham. [ 132 → 135] Secondly, Christ's love is not unconditional. [ 136 → 139] Well, it is in one sense, and in one sense only. [ 140 → 144] And that is in the sense that he offered himself for our redemption [ 144 → 145] while we were here. [ 145 → 151] God's love is unconditional. [ 151 → 155] Yes, in that sense only, God's love is unconditional. [ 155 → 159] But, of course, that's something Francis never explains, right? [ 159 → 164] Or any of these other modernists that love to talk about how God's love is unconditional. [ 165 → 170] God's love is not unconditional in the sense that no matter what you do, [ 170 → 171] God will always forgive. [ 172 → 173] God will never be angry. [ 173 → 174] God will never punish. [ 174 → 182] and in the end you go to heaven because, oh, the love. No. And yet that is precisely what Francis [ 182 → 190] suggests by his constant harping on God's unconditional love. Thirdly, it's false and [ 190 → 197] probably heretical to say that everyone has the desire for Christ in his heart. It sounds very [ 197 → 203] much like a denial of original sin or of its consequences. And of course, it's just absurd [ 203 → 208] on the face of it. I mean, are we supposed to believe that some Islamic terrorist bombing [ 208 → 217] churches has desire for Christ in his heart? Hello? But then it seems that that's precisely [ 217 → 225] what Father Murad believes because he also says that by living in humble poverty among Muslims, [ 226 → 232] quote, we also cultivate the expectation that Jesus is present in Muslims. [ 233 → 240] Unquote. Now, by saying that, he's really just echoing Francis, who said in Bangladesh in 2017 [ 240 → 249] that the Muslim Rohingya refugees are an instance of the presence of God today. That is the precise [ 249 → 256] phrase he used, the presence of God today. Now, if we were to challenge that, of course, [ 256 → 262] the response we would get is that this is just the teaching of Matthew 25, right, where Christ said, [ 262 → 263] whatever you do, you will be saved. And so, he's really just echoing Francis, who said that by [ 263 → 269] saying, whatever you did to the least of my brethren, you did to me. See? There. Christ [ 269 → 278] considers the poor to be himself. Yes, that is true in a certain sense, but that's not what [ 278 → 284] Father Murad was talking about. He didn't say Jesus is present in the poor. He said he is present [ 284 → 293] in Muslims. And although our Lord said, yes, that I was hungry and you gave me to eat, I was thirsty, [ 293 → 300] and you gave me to drink, I was sick, and you visited me, etc., he did not say, I was an unbeliever [ 300 → 308] and you helped me, or I was an idolater and you cared for me. Now, don't misunderstand. I'm not [ 308 → 314] saying that we shouldn't help poor people if they're Muslim. I'm not saying that. Of course, [ 314 → 320] we should. I'm saying that it's nonsense to say that Christ is present in Muslims. [ 320 → 323] What is that supposed to mean anyway? [ 323 → 329] I mean, concretely, he's not there in terms of sanctifying grace. That's for sure. I mean, [ 329 → 337] Muslims aren't even baptized. They're supernaturally dead, as is any even Catholic [ 337 → 344] in the state of mortal sin. So Christ is not supernaturally present in a Muslim, and that [ 344 → 350] would only leave a natural presence. But Christ is certainly not naturally present in a Muslim [ 350 → 352] either. It's true that Christ became [ 352 → 353] incarnate. [ 353 → 360] That he took on a human nature and so became our brother. But that doesn't mean that he is [ 360 → 369] present in each human being. To say otherwise is naturalism. And by the way, if Christ were [ 369 → 376] present in Muslims and in all people, then why is Francis going to Iraq to bring him to them, [ 377 → 382] Father Murad? Now, switching gears for a minute, here's a headline that appeared on the [ 382 → 382] Catholic News. [ 382 → 383] The Catholic News. [ 383 → 392] World Report on March 4th. Cardinal Grech to Irish bishops. A synodal process promises an [ 392 → 400] ecclesial springtime. Look, if there's one thing they don't need in the Novus Ordo, it's yet another [ 400 → 405] new springtime in the faith. Okay, I mean, they're still recovering from the prior one. [ 406 → 412] And for those who don't know, I'm talking about Vatican II, that new Pentecost, new springtime, [ 412 → 419] the Great Renewal, and all these monikers that they came up with. In actual fact, of course, [ 419 → 425] instead of a genuine renewal of Catholic faith and practice, what they got once the initial [ 425 → 434] excitement wore off was a more or less gradual descent into nothing short of apostasy. And that's [ 434 → 441] obvious, okay? People lost the faith left and right. The true faith was replaced by a counterfeit, [ 442 → 449] sacrifice of the mass became a banal liturgical meal. Infant baptisms went down. Marriages went [ 449 → 456] down. I think the only thing that actually went up was annulments. Boy, did they. Confession was [ 456 → 462] discouraged and turned into more of a psychological counseling session. All awareness of the seriousness [ 462 → 471] of sin was lost. So-called social justice causes were introduced. The supernatural was replaced by [ 471 → 472] the natural. God was dethroned. The supernatural was replaced by the natural. God was dethroned. [ 472 → 480] And man was placed at the center instead. But all of that isn't enough yet for this new cardinal [ 480 → 488] from Malta, Mario Grech, because he now wants another one of those rotten springtimes. [ 488 → 492] Addressing the Novels Ordo Bishops of Ireland, Mr. Grech said, [ 492 → 501] quote, a synodal process promises an ecclesial springtime, a rebirth of an authentic church, [ 502 → 502] unquote. [ 502 → 509] Okay, so note well, ladies and gentlemen, he just acknowledged that his church is fake. I mean, [ 510 → 515] why else would he need an authentic church to be reborn, right? And so according to him, [ 515 → 523] this authentic church is going to be the fruit of the synodal process, which is basically a bunch [ 523 → 531] of Novels Ordo Bishops meeting up to discern together what the spirit is saying. Look, I have [ 531 → 532] no doubt that the church is fake. I mean, why else would he need an authentic church to be reborn? [ 532 → 538] That is going to result in an authentic something or other, but it's not going to be an authentic [ 538 → 545] church. The only authentic church was founded by our blessed Lord and Savior Jesus Christ [ 545 → 554] 2,000 years ago, and Club Francis isn't it. Meanwhile, the chief Novels Ordo Bishop in [ 554 → 562] Germany, the land of Martin Luther, has put his foot down about intercommunion between Novels [ 562 → 569] Ordos and Lutherans. Listen to this from a report by a Catholic news agency dated March 3rd. [ 570 → 576] Quote, a leading German Catholic bishop has cautioned priests against intercommunion with [ 576 → 583] Protestants during an ecumenical event in May. Bishop Georg Betzing of Limburg said in a March [ 583 → 591] 1st letter to clergy that they should only give Holy Communion to non-Catholic individuals if [ 591 → 591] they were to be reconciled with the Catholic Church. So, what does that mean? Well, it means that [ 591 → 591] they should only give Holy Communion to non-Catholic individuals if they were to be reconciled with [ 591 → 592] the Catholic Church. So, what does that mean? Well, it means that they should only give Holy [ 592 → 592] Communion to non-Catholic individuals if they were to be reconciled with the Catholic Church. So, [ 592 → 605] after examining their consciences, unquote, tough guy, huh? He explains, quote, [ 605 → 612] the prerequisite for a worthy reception of the Eucharistic gifts for both Catholics and [ 612 → 621] non-Catholics is the examination of one's conscience, unquote. No, the absolute minimum [ 621 → 621] for a non-Catholic is to be reconciled with the Catholic Church. So, what does that mean? Well, [ 621 → 627] the prerequisite for a worthy reception of Holy Communion is the state of sanctifying grace, [ 627 → 636] doofus. And, of course, non-Catholics are never permitted to receive Holy Communion in the real [ 636 → 643] Catholic Church, that is. It is permitted, indeed, in the Novus Ordo sect, and that is in their canon [ 643 → 650] law and in the fake magisterium of John Paul II. And you can look this up yourself. It's [ 650 → 662] canon 844, paragraphs 3 and 4 of the 1983 Code of Canon Law, as well as in canon 671, [ 662 → 670] paragraphs 3 and 4 of the 1990 Code of Canons for the Eastern Churches. And you can also find it in [ 670 → 680] John Paul's encyclical Ecclesia de Eucharistia, number 45. Furthermore, it is found in the [ 680 → 690] 1993 Directory for the Application of Principles and Norms on Ecumenism, paragraphs 129 through 131. [ 691 → 699] Yeah, that's Saint John Paul II for you. All right, one more. We're going to go back to the [ 699 → 707] Frankster. Headline on Catholic World Report on March 2nd, Pope Francis, World Could Face a New [ 707 → 709] Great Flood. [ 710 → 715] Now, when I first read that, I thought, oh, wow, you mean he actually believes in the first one? [ 715 → 722] But then when you read the article, he kind of waffles on it. The report says, [ 722 → 728] quote, he noted that experts regarded the flood as a mythical story. He stressed that he did not [ 728 → 734] wish to be misquoted as saying that the Bible is a myth, but suggested that myth was a form [ 734 → 740] of knowledge. The flood is a historical account, archaeologists say, because, [ 740 → 747] they found evidence of a flood in their excavations, he said, unquote. Well, that's nice. [ 748 → 755] So, Francis is willing to concede that the deluge actually happened, not because God himself says [ 755 → 761] so, but because archaeologists tell him so. You see, that's always a good way to proceed, right? [ 762 → 767] Is this account in scripture a myth or not? Hmm, let's see what the archaeologists have to say [ 767 → 768] about it. [ 769 → 770] Now, of course, we're going to go back to the book of Acts, and we're going to go back to the book of [ 770 → 770] Acts, and we're going to go back to the book of Acts, and we're going to go back to the book of Acts, [ 770 → 775] God himself promised that he would never again punish the world with a great flood like that. [ 776 → 779] In Genesis 9-11, God told Noah, quote, [ 780 → 798] So, why is Francis even bringing up this idea of a new flood? [ 799 → 800] Does he think God is going to punish the world with a great flood like that? [ 800 → 804] Does he think God will break his promise because he's so sick and tired of all the apostasy, [ 805 → 809] the greed and envy, the impurity, the hatred, and the bloodshed in the world? [ 810 → 816] Oh, wait, let me rephrase that in Bergoglio-friendly terms. Does he think God will break his promise [ 816 → 823] because he's so sick and tired of all the gossip, the unemployment, the rigidity, the disunity among [ 823 → 829] religions, the refusal to encounter others, and the walls being put up instead of bridges? [ 830 → 839] Oh, no. No. Francis is concerned that there may be a new flood because of climate change. [ 840 → 844] You know, some people are their own best parody. [ 845 → 850] Tradcast Express is a production of Novus Ordo Watch. Check us out at tradcast.org, [ 850 → 854] and if you like what we're doing, please consider making a tax-deductible contribution [ 854 → 858] at novusortowatch.org slash donate. [ 860 → 860] Thank you.