00:00
and now coming to you from an undisclosed location it's the Novus Ordo watch

00:01
[Music] [Applause] [Music] [Applause] one of the most difficult things in life
is to keep up with all the garbage that constantly emanates from the Vatican to
sect but that's what we're here for we keep track of it all so you don't have to
thank you for tuning in this is the 22nd episode of track cast the state of
economist podcast that even non c'è data comments listen to even if they don't
have the guts to admit it alright let's start with a few quick and light things
to kind of get everybody into good mood here and we can leave the deeper heavier
stuff for later once you're warmed up a bit on April 20th the normal sort of

00:02
news website crux published a story with the hilarious headline humanity 2.0
Vatican hosts experts to discuss tenderness really you just wonder what
journalists are thinking when they put up stuff like that this particular
article was written by Cindy wooden and the opening paragraph reads like this
quote close to 100 finance seers philanthropists artists tech experts
physicians politicians and religious leaders spent more than an hour in a
Vatican meeting room talking about tenderness unquote and you you really
have to see it to believe it we've got it linked in the show notes for you
track cast dot org simply look for track
cast 22 and you'll you can click on that link and then you'll find all the notes

00:03
for the show so for those who want to read the rest of the article hey go for
it just don't say you weren't warned okay another headline that caught my eye
recently was put out by the National non Catholic Register and this is what it
says author Pope Francis is a mystic trying to solve the left-right dichotomy
in the church oh man I could have fooled
me you know seriously the more desperate these people become the more absurd the
claims they make but I think there could be a strategy behind it see sometimes
the best way to sell a ridiculous proposition is to make it so ridiculous
so over-the-top that it becomes credible again because I guess everyone
instinctively thinks that it is so harebrained that everyone would

00:04
immediately reject it so therefore it must be plausible I think that's the the
unconscious thought process behind it and if I'm not mistaken that's a
favorite tactic of Communists the author in question here by the way is Massimo
Borghese and he makes his claim about the mystic
Francis who quote conceives his mission as initiating processes that the Spirit
will bring to a solution unquote oh no doubt they'll come to a solution alright
but I don't think it's gonna be a pretty one Borghese book about Francis by the
way is called Jorge Mario bergoglio an intellectual biography now honestly to
dignify the claptrap that incessantly spews forth from the bergoglio mouth as
intellectual is an insult to the human intellect this man promotes a toxic mix

00:05
of sappy greeting-card spirituality Jewish existentialism free masonic
naturalism Talmudic psychology and the touch of catholicism on top just enough
to make the masses think his doctrine has something to do with the Catholic
Church but hey we're also willing to give credit where credit is due and just
the other day Francis said something that was actually correct yeah he said
something that we must agree with it doesn't happen too often but every now
and then he just can't help himself and blurts out
something that is the absolute truth on June 22nd after visiting the
accumulative churches in Geneva Switzerland he gave his usual in-flight
entertainment press conference and he said this quote there can be no akyuu

00:06
Minh ISM with proselytism we need to choose either you are of an ecumenical
spirit or you are a proselyte correct that is exactly right you can either
practice converting people to Catholicism or you can practice acumen
ISM but both is impossible to do because the two are mutually exclusive what do
you know Francis is just like a broken clock he's
right on the rare occasion and then only
by accident next can you believe it it's already been over three years since the
arrival of laudato si that's the incredibly edifying encyclical Francis
wrote about protecting the environment yeah and so of course the Vatican is
commemorating this significant anniversary with a special international

00:07
conference taking place on July 5th and 6th entitled saving of the common home
and the future of life on Earth by contrast back in 2007 when it was the
100th anniversary of the big anti-modernist and cyclical posh nd
Domenici courageous of Pope st. Pius the tenth the Vatican under Benedict the
sixteenth commemorated that with absolutely nothing
well priorities you know save the earth or save souls
okay the next two stories we can lump together under the rubric false
principles have consequences a controversy has erupted in the Society
of st. Pius the tenth United States District regarding the question of

00:08
whether Ascension Day is a holy day of obligation
meaning Mass attendance binds under pain
of mortal sin you see the difficulty for
the lefeve rights is this they recognize the country's bogus Ordo bishops as
legitimate Catholic Bishops who possess ecclesiastical jurisdiction and these
bogus or doe bishops have decided that Ascension Day is not a holy day of
obligation except in the states of New Jersey Pennsylvania Connecticut Rhode
Island Massachusetts Vermont New Hampshire Maine and Nebraska so the
question is what's the SPX going to do the traditional thing to do is to
observe Ascension Day as a holy day of obligation and I don't recall the sspx
in former times really caring about what the modernist Novus Ordo bishops had to
say about it but then if they are the legitimate Catholic Bishops then they

00:09
certainly have every right to determine what days are holy days of obligation
and what days aren't so the SSPX is in a bit of a difficult spot here because
they have to do a balancing act between recognizing the supposed áfourá T of the
Novus Ordo bishops on the one hand but also not compromising tradition on the
other and this is now causing the wildermann among their people as can be
seen in a discussion forum thread on the topic that we're linking in the show
notes and this is one of the problems you end up with if you're trying to be
Catholic in a non Catholic Church it's what you get when you acknowledge non
Catholics as legitimate Catholic authorities of course the general idea
is well we'll submit to the Novus Ordo hierarchy in all things except when they
legislate something that's harmful okay but the problem then obviously

00:10
becomes that you need to have some kind of objective way to determine what is
and isn't harmful contrary to the determination of the supposedly
legitimate ecclesiastical authority and that's where you run into absurdity see
God promised that the church would never universally teach or legislate evil and
not that the church would do so but then the splinter group of your choosing
would infallibly remain steadfast and oppose all the evil from the church okay
that's just crazy so who decides what is harmful is removing Ascension Day as a
holy day of obligation harmful well that's already where people disagree but
hey maybe not ascension Thursday but then what about the Immaculate
Conception or Christmas how far can it go until it becomes
harmful or what about the so called Luminous Mysteries that john paul ii

00:11
added to the Holy Rosary in 2002 may who in the sspx praise those and yet if you
think about it they're not harmful or sinful to pray I mean they're all
biblical events the Luminous Mysteries are Christ's baptism in the Jordan the
wedding at Cana the proclamation of the kingdom of God the Transfiguration and
the institution of the Holy Eucharist as anyone in the Society of st. Pius the
tenth really going to argue that those are sinful or harmful mysteries to
meditate on course not and yet why have they not included them in their rosaries
see once you reject submission to lawful ecclesiastical authority it's over now
of course I'm not saying that anyone should submit to the Novus Ordo
hierarchy no I'm saying that if you seek to hold fast to traditional Catholicism

00:12
then the only way you can refuse submission to the Novus Ordo hierarchy
as you must is if you hold that they are not the legitimate Catholic
hierarchy anything else does violence to
Catholic teaching the very teaching that traditional Catholics are bound to Oh
hold and what is so difficult about recognizing that the Novus Ordo
hierarchy is not Catholic and they didn't just abolish ascension Thursday
they've abolished the whole Catholic religion for goodness sake you know a
participant in the comm box of our blog made a great point the other day this
was in a thread about the 30th anniversary of the Episcopal
consecration zuv Archbishop Marcela 5:39 teen 88 a few days before that the
prefect of the Congregation for bishops Cardinal Bernard Ganton had sent

00:13
Archbishop Lefebvre Notty of excommunication if he went ahead with
the unauthorized consecration of Bishops LaFave and his defenders of course
ignored it essentially claiming that this was invalid and that the penalty
would not in fact be incurred and yet are these not the very same people who
argued today that before Francis could be considered a public heretic he would
have to show himself pertinacious by ignoring or refusing a canonical warning
issued by the cardinals isn't it funny how that works if Francis gets a
canonical warning from his underlings mind you if he gets a canonical warning
and ignores it he's toast he's to be condemned
he's lost his office and that's proof positive right there and yet when a
canonical warning is issued against the Society of Saint Pius the tenth from the
very authority that they recognize as legitimate then it can be ignored and

00:14
resisted with impunity oh this is just rich it goes to show that at the end of
the day the Society of st. Pius the tenth only adheres to one principle and
that is the sspx is the final authority it is judged by no one
and nobody can appeal from its judgment and now for our second story under the
category of false principles have consequences the parishioners of the
traditional Latin Mass parish of st. John Kenya sand Chicago are outraged
because even though their pastor the Reverend Frank Phillips who had been
temporarily removed due to allegations of misconduct has been found innocent of
all charges he will not be returning to the parish and as faculties for priestly
ministry will remain withdrawn how is that possible easy

00:15
his boss calls the shots and his boss is Cardinal blaze sue pitch the ultra
modernist dirtbag sue pitch is an arch enemy of anything that remotely
resembles Catholicism especially the traditional Latin Mass so it's not
surprising that he would do whatever he can to hurt this indole parish and I
wouldn't be surprised if he closes it all together at some point or does
something to make the parish insufferable for everyone and this shows
the absurd predicament that the whole in dolt movement the movement to have the
traditional Latin Mass but under the auspices of the Novus Ordo hierarchy is
really in like the SSPX they too are trying to be Catholic in a non Catholic
Church and now they're suffering because they're being humiliated by a super

00:16
modernist false hierarch appointed by Francis who in reality has nothing to do
with the Catholic Church well that's what you get when you acknowledge non
Catholics as Catholic authorities that's what you get when you're seeking
permission to be Catholic from non Catholics yes it may work for a while
for as long as they don't interfere too badly and you can pretty much do your
own thing but the principle is flawed and therefore you're going to run into
trouble before long if you're content to accept non Catholic wolves as your
legitimate Catholic Shepard's then don't complain when the
wolves are starting to do what wolves do eat the Sheep so here too we see that
false principles have consequences submit to a modernist and you will
eventually get modernism all right our next story is just over a year old but
it really doesn't matter because it's no

00:17
less relevant today in fact even more so
it could be entitled arsonists warned of conflagration or modernists warned
against modernism or offering the cause of the disease as the cure a Novus Ordo
priest by the name of Linus Clovis spoke at the Rome life forum in the Eternal
City on May 18th 2017 as talk was entitled the anti Church has arrived
so far so good we can agree the problem is he presents Paul the sixth and John
Paul the second as having tried to fight the anti Church when the truth is of
course that they are two of the individuals most responsible for its
emergence and continued existence ooh so Paul the sixth lamented that the

00:18
smoke of Satan had entered the church yes he said that indeed on June 29 1972
and he was probably secretly boasting I mean John the 23rd lit the fire and Paul
the sixth made sure that it was going to burn everything down and then he
disingenuously complained about the smoke of Satan ironically Father Clovis
says that quote it is necessary that we face squarely the reality of our
situation that is since ignorance is a cause of fear we must both admit that
there is a problem and identify the nature of the problem thank God this
work has already been done for us by st. Pius the tenth
one masked modernism the enemy within by Saint John Paul who alerted us to the
anti Church the form of the enemy within and by Pope Paul the sixth who on the

00:19
60th anniversary of the miracle of the son described the extent of the success
of the enemy within unquote folks this willing suspension of
disbelief has got to stop especially today over 50 years after vatican ii
when everything is so clear if you're looking to figure out this horrible
situation we're in with the anti church in rome then the first thing you need to
do is stop with the silly illusions the Novus Ordo anti Church in Rome was
imposed from the top john xxiii prepared the way and laid the foundations Paul
the sixth formerly instituted and codified the new church and gave it its
fall sacraments it's ugly art and architecture and all that as for John
Paul the first his 33 day stint in the Vatican is completely irrelevant and

00:20
John Paul the second made the new church attractive to the masses he filled it
with charisma he gave it personality and a conservative veneer and boldly led it
into so many foul and filthy errors especially the the whole inner religious
peace prayer blasphemies the theology of the body the evil new code of canon law
the incredibly offensive directory for the application of principles and norms
on the cuman ISM the whole idolatry of man and the worship of the youth the
introduction of altar girls then this whole idea of the Pope as popstar
the endless travelling around the globe and kissing the soil upon arrival the
veneration of false religions and so on and so forth but Clovis is right on one
thing John Paul the second did alert us to the existence of the anti Church in

00:21
1977 as Cardinal Karol vitia he wrote in his book sign of
contradiction quote the church succeeded during the Second Vatican Council in
redefining her own nature unquote folks if you're looking for a new church an
anti Church look no further than the Church of the Second Vatican Council boy
tiwa himself publicly stated that it was a church of a different nature that
means it's a new church a different church not the church founded by Jesus
Christ and therefore not the religion of Jesus Christ necessarily then it is a
religion of the devil and yes you can look up that quote from widows book for
yourself we have a scanned image of the page from which it's taken so just look
for that in the show notes for this episode it's found on page 17 of the

00:22
1979 edition published by Seabury press and the book again is called sign of
contradiction here is more from the Reverend Clovis quote it is self-evident
that the Catholic Church and the anti Church currently coexist in the same
sacramental liturgical and juridical space unquote
isn't that interesting unfortunately the author here does not explain how one
would know whether one is participating in the unholy rites of the anti Church
or in the divine worship of the true church it all coexist somehow in the
same space in the Vatican two church apparently the Son of God shares a space
with the devil unbelievable unbelievable Clovis continues quote the latter
meaning the anti Church the latter having grown stronger is now attempting

00:23
to pass itself off as the true church all the better to induct or coerce the
faithful into becoming adherents promoters and defenders of a secular ideology
should the anti Church succeed in common dear
during all the space of the true church the rights of man will supplant the
rights of God through the desecration of the sacraments the sacrilege of the
sanctuary and the abuse of apostolic power unquote yeah like that hasn't
happened in the Vatican to church in that church preaches religious liberty
over the rights of the true religion it has completely desecrated the sacraments
and rendered a good number of them invalid there is sacrilege galore in the
sanctuary okay where there still is a sanctuary that is and in many cases has
been replaced entirely and turn into a worship space so I don't know what

00:24
Clovis thinks he's doing here but if people like him are supposed to be the
defenders of Orthodoxy that are going to hold the line against the anti Church
then heaven help us all right do we have time for one more or should we take a
break hey let's do one more with a little audio here for the fun of it okay
the following soundbite is from Father Joseph Pfeifer formerly with the Society
of Saint Pius the tenth and for the last few years he's been on his own with a
few other associates who left or were expelled from the SSPX because they
opposed the liberalizing influences there in the second half of June Father
Pfeiffer gave what he called a doctrinal conference and I want it respond to
something that he says there that someone pointed me to because I want to

00:25
show how absurd the argumentation has become here is father Pfeiffer obey
dream the sixth stay that is beyond question that a pope can earn and mater is
touching the faith he can teach heresy and decrees and many women fathers are
heretics if by the Roman Church you mean its head or pontiff it is beyond
question that he can err even in matters touching the faith he does this when he
teaches heresy by his own judgment or decree ttle and truth many fathers are
heretics Bojan the 20 seconds so father Pfeiffer
tells you that Pope Adrian vi said that the Pope can air in matters of faith can
teach heresy and that many Roman pontiff's were heretics now let me show
you all the things that are wrong with this number one the individual in
question was not Pope when he said this that was before he became Pope so it's
misleading to say that Pope Adrian vi said these things because as Pope he did

00:26
not he said them as a theologian long before he became Pope number two
certain ideas regarding the papacy were still permitted to be held back then
we're talking the sixteenth century but they're no longer permitted today
because the church has since condemned them as errors or otherwise forbidden
them to be held number three how does father Pfeiffer think he can square what
he just said with a dogmatic Constitution posture attorneys of the
first Vatican Council and other Magisterial teachings on the papacy as
the perpetual guarantee of Orthodoxy that can never fail you can't go by a
theologian from the 1500s if what he said was subsequently contradicted by
the church's Magisterium come on number four the question of papal heresy came

00:27
up at the first Vatican Council as the council fathers were debating papal
infallibility let me quote you the report on this of Archbishop John
Purcell of Cincinnati who before the dogmatic definition was opposed to papal
infallibility and therefore can hardly be accused of being biased in our favor
here here is what Archbishop Purcell wrote quote the question was also raised
by a cardinal what is to be done with the Pope if he becomes a heretic it was
answered that there has never been such a case the Council of Bishops could
depose him for heresy for from the and he becomes a heretic he is not the
head or even a member of the church the church would not be for a moment obliged
to listen to him when he begins to teach a doctrine the church knows to be a
false doctrine and he would cease to be Pope being deposed by God himself

00:28
unquote now you can look all of that up by clicking on the links that we've
provided in the show notes ok it's all there
totally documented what I just quoted and also the things about posture
Turner's and Adrienne the sixth number five even if we assume is true for the
sake of argument the false claim that father Pfeiffer made that a pope
Adrienne the sixth said that a pope can air and teach heresy and that many
pontiff's were heretics has it not occurred to father Pfeiffer then by the
same token then maybe it was Adrienne the sixth who was teaching heresy in
that very instance how do we know that that teaching isn't heretical if the
Pope can teach heresy so you see that at Pfeiffer here is giving you complete
theological junk and yet people continually look up to these recognize

00:29
and resist clergy as the reliable guardians of Catholic tradition and
orthodoxy they are not now just for fairness sake I have to point out that I
didn't listen to anything else from that
so-called doctrinal conference of follow Pfeiffer but that right there is a
deal-breaker oh and by the way the only book that I'm aware of that
still repeated the quote from the theologian Adrienne who later became
Pope Adrian about many Roman pontiff's having having been heretics the only
book to repeat that after the first Vatican Council in 1870 was a book by
Paul Violette called the infallibility of the Pope and the syllabus and that
work was placed on the index of forbidden books under Pope st. Pius
the tenth just saying okay all right I'd say it's time for a break now lots

00:30
coming up still we're going to expose some heresy and the remnant will unspin
Christopher Ferrara and we'll also have a new episode of from the Jorge's mouth
don't go away [Music] we hope you are enjoying the sample of
the motet Felix na is from the album sacred choral music by Nicholas Wilton
sung by the acclaimed English choir Magnificat if you appreciate such a
sacred choral music please support the traditional Catholic composer Nicholas
Wilton by buying a copy of a CD or purchasing downloads of individual

00:31
tracks from for Marks music comm that is fo you are ma RK s mu si si calm or his
website Catholic music co uk there is more information and also a new CD abyss
piano music available on those websites [Music]

00:32
if you're looking for EWTN this ain't it trap cast [Applause] [Music]
returning from our little break we will now continue with our second segment of
this track cast number 22 [Music] trap cast is produced by Novus Ordo
watch your Catholic beacon of sanity in a world gone mad [Music]

00:33
you know as I was starting to prepare for this podcast episode I came across a
headline that made me literally burst into laughter
it's from Christopher Ferrara's column Fatima perspectives on Fatima org
installment number 1211 the headline is France is a scarlet letter a little F
from Frances gives the society German Bishops everything they want now what I
find so funny about this is that Ferrara
uses the label siz Matic to refer to the German Novus Ordo bishops it makes you
wonder does the man have the faintest idea what's ISM even means let me give
you the full story here this is important because it shows how badly for
our twists reality in order to continue to promote the false but convenient
recognize and resist position see if Ferrara were just some lone blogger out

00:34
there with no real audience then this would be no big deal but of course he's
a well respected and influential author columnist and commentator to whom a lot
of people look up especially people who get their information about what
supposedly constitutes traditional Catholicism from the Fatima Center and
the remnant first the background please bear with me here because this is going
to take some time but I trust you'll find it quite informative back in
February the Novus Ordo bishops of Germany had decided in their plenary
assembly that they were going to produce a guide about the permissibility of
Protestant spouses in mixed marriages to receive the Novus Ordo version of Holy
Communion Edward Penton from the National Catholic
Register reported this as follows on February 22nd quote German bishops have
voted overwhelmingly in favor of producing a guide for Protestant spouses

00:35
and reception of Holy Communion under certain conditions at their spring
conference in Ingolstadt the German Bishops Conference agreed that
Robeson partner of a Catholic can receive the Eucharist after having made
a serious examination of conscience with
a priest or another person with pastoral responsibilities affirms the faith of
the Catholic Church wishes to end serious spiritual distress and has a
longing to satisfy a hunger for the Eucharist unquote a few individual
dissenting voices among the German Novus Ordo episcopate then appealed to Rome
asking them to step in and prevent this guide from becoming reality
in response Francis ordered the different parties to come to Rome to
tell them essentially that he wasn't going to get involved and that they'd

00:36
better figure this out on their own that was in early May then on May 25th the
prefect of the Vatican's doctrinal office sent a letter to Cardinal marks
the head of the German bishops telling him that Francis had told him that the
guide on a long communion for Protestants was quote not ready for
publication and this was hailed by some as a great victory that the Vatican had
shot down the inner communion proposal but the fact is that the objections from
the Vatican were not objections of theological principle but of pastoral
prudence including what this would do to ecumenical relations with churches
outside of Germany and so forth you still with me so far good because it
gets better Francis was asked about this during his
inflight press conference returning from Geneva on June 21st and there he said

00:37
that he supported ladarius letter la Darya being the head of the doctrinal
office in Rome Francis said that he supported ladarius letter and noted that
the problem with the proposed German inter communion guide was that it
conflicted with the 1983 code of canon law which says that the decision on
whether a Protestant gets to receive Communion is made by each
local bishop for his own diocese in other words Francis is totally cool with
it if individual bishops want to make that call for their diocese he just
doesn't want it to be a universal norm for all of Germany the novus ordo news
website crux reported on Frances words as follows quote Francis said the
problem with having an entire bishops conference deal with such questions is
that something worked out in an Episcopal conference quickly becomes
universal at the same time Francis praised the bishops efforts saying their

00:38
document was well thought out with a Christian spirit whatever the German
conference may come up with in the end the Pope said likely will be an
orientational document so that every one
of the diocesan bishops can determine by himself with the code of canon law
already permits unquote and then guess what happened on June 27th the German
bishops released the very document that Francis had forbidden them from
releasing but they did so with a clever trick they published it as an
independent document and not as an official document of the German Bishops
Conference basically they just published
the text without associating it with the National Conference of German bishops
there is no author and no Association mentioned and so they release this and

00:39
it is now no longer called a pastoral handout but is simply now an orientation
aid it's clever but of course not without France's blessing you see
Cardinal Marx is also part of France's advisory council in the Vatican and so
he has more access to the unholy father than most other people did and Marx has
now produced a document in which he summarizes conversation he had with
Francis on June 11th and that includes the following points number one the May
25th letter from prefect la Daria is to be understood only as containing
recommendations and not instructions as to how the bishops conference must act
number two Francis doesn't want the pastoral handout on inner communion to
be published as a text of the bishops conference because this is a matter for
the universal Church but the text of the handout can and is supposed to be an

00:40
orientation and study aid for the local bishops and thirdly since the text of
the handout is supposed to be an aid to the individual diocesan bishops it can
therefore naturally be published so these things marks resolved with Francis
and Francis has indicated his approval of this summary of the conversation by
initialing the paper that marks had written up with a capital F for Francis
and then dating at June 12th 2018 that ladies and gentlemen is the background
to Ferrara's peace in as Fatima perspectives column so let's look at one
crucial paragraph there for our complains quote here's how Pope Francis
signature now being touted as a papal Authority by Cardinal marks appears on
the note f12 618 that is Frances wish to green-light the sacrilege diocese by

00:41
diocese but did not wish to sign his entire name to the document unleashing
it evidently because of an instinctive refusal to commit fully the authority of
the papacy to this incredible act of ecclesial destruction in accordance with
his general modus operandi Francis prefers the wink and the nod to an
explicit papal endorsement of heresy and sacrilege a little F will do to signify
his agreement to let each Bishop do what he cannot authorize as Pope but wishes
to give the impression he has authorised unquote now this is typical Ferrara
instead of giving you a cool analysis of the facts and then drawing a reasonable
conclusion from them he gives you spin meaning he gives you a heavily slanted
interpretation of the fact that is designed to support
the preconceived conclusion he wants to persuade you of first if you look at the

00:42
actual document that Francis put his initial on and we've got that linked for
you in the show notes for this episode so you concede for yourself if you look
at that document then you see that Francis simply initialed and dated it
somewhere in the margin and typically that would simply mean that he read the
text and agrees with it that makes sense
because it was a brief note put together by Cardinal marks recapping the
conversation he'd had with Francis so it will make sense that Francis to signal
his approval would initial and date it Ferrara though makes it seem like
Francis should have signed the document with his full name and decided not to
because he didn't want to use the fullness of his supposed to papal
authority to authorize the sacrilege that makes no sense whatsoever and the
only reason why Ferrara is arguing it is because it bolsters his thesis of the
great facade which is that all the evil changes since vatican ii have all been

00:43
only seemingly imposed but not actually now don't get me wrong I'm not trying to
defend Francis or Cardinal Marx here I'm simply trying to show how Christopher
Ferrara misleads his readers he's a lawyer by profession and he thinks like
a lawyer meaning he's got a case to argue and so whatever he finds that he
can spin in support of his position that's what he's going to use had
Francis signed his name instead of just initialing this would not have made a
hill of beans worth of a difference because all the initial or the signature
means is that Francis agrees that the recap of the conversation Marx provided
is accurate that's it so when Ferrara says that Francis initialing rather than
signing shows an instinctive refusal to commit fully the authority of the papacy
to this incredible act of ecclesial destruction it's pure baloney any way

00:44
you look at it Francis is obviously authorizing each German bishop
make his own determination about which Protestant to allow to receive Novus
Ordo Communion whether he does that with
a signature or an initial or a back slap is really irrelevant
this isn't about a signature this is about what Francis told Marx and is
authorizing him to do Farrar continues quote father Gruner never ceased to
denounce the fakery by which the entire church has been subverted since Vatican
2 the false appearance of a command where none has actually been given and
none can be given because no command destructive of the faith can be anything
but void ab initio meaning from the outset no matter what a piece of paper
may say so it was with the non-existent banning of the Latin Mass a fraud
exposed by benedict xvi and some more important if acum so what was with the

00:45
papal Reis grip that Francis authorized Secretary of State Pietro parolin to
issue stating that the intrinsically impossible permission to administer Holy
Communion to public adulterers is authentic Magisterium unquote and there
you have Ferrara's entire idea of how the infallibility and in defect ability
of the church works the Pope and the church can impose anything they please
and when it's bad or wrong or heretical or harmful then it doesn't count that is
not only false theologically it's also ridiculous
I mean what Protestant couldn't say the same thing about his church what value
is there in saying that the church cannot give evil if all we mean by it is
that when she does then it doesn't count I mean that's just stupid

00:46
okay what kind of church is it where the Pope the Vicar of Christ teaches and
governs his church but then some lawyer from Virginia comes along and says no no
no no no this isn't right this isn't traditional that's not what we did
before this is contrary to the gospel and so we have the right and the duty to
resist it yada yada yada what is this well whatever it is it's certainly not
Catholic ecclesiology here listen to these beautiful words from a real Pope
quote the discipline sanctioned by the church must never be rejected or be
branded as contrary to certain principles of natural law it must never
be called crippled or imperfect or subject to civil authority in this
discipline the administration of sacred rites standards of morality and the
reckoning of the rights of the church and her ministers are embraced unquote

00:47
and that was pope gregory xvi in his encyclical murari voz number nine then
also Pope Pius the 12th quote certainly the loving mother the church is spotless
in the sacraments by which she gives birth to and nourishes her children in
the faith which she has always preserved in violet in her sacred laws imposed on
all in the evangelical councils which she recommends in those heavenly gifts
and extraordinary graces through which with an exhaustible fecundity she
generates hosts of martyrs virgins and confessors unquote and that's from the
encyclical mr. cheek or paris' number 66 so listen closely mr. Ferrara when the
Church teaches that she is spotless and infallible in her Universal disciplinary
laws in her liturgical rites in the canonization of saints and so on then
that is precisely what it means it means that a true Pope cannot promulgate evil
not that he can but since he's not supposed to

00:48
you can simply ignore it no it actually cannot happen and because it cannot
happen therefore it will never happen no Pope will ever do such a thing God
Himself guarantees it well excuse me but I'm tired of this okay these are the
people who hold themselves up as the great defenders of traditional
Catholicism and when you look closely they do not uphold the traditional
Catholic doctrine in its traditional understanding and of
course they cannot because they insist that the Vatican two popes are
legitimate and that's what kills it all that's what throws a monkey wrench into
it all again and again so you see these things matter whether Francis is Pope or
not matters while it matters to a Catholic anyway and it's simply not true
to maintain as Ferrara does that a lot of these evil laws from the Vatican two

00:49
sect were not genuinely imposed that is all just this great facade that's always
been his claim but it's simply not true let's take the banning of the
traditional Latin Mass for example Ferrara says that it was never really
banned and they all just conspired to make it look like it was nonsense on
October 28th 1974 the modernist Vatican's Congregation for divine
worship issued a notification making this very clear let me quote from it
quote when a conference of Bishops decrees that the translation of the
Roman Missal or any part of it for example the order
of mass is obligatory in a region mass weather in Latin or the vernacular may
be celebrated lawfully only according to the right of the Roman Missal
promulgated on the 3rd of April 1969 by authority of Pope Paul the sixth unquote
now Ferrara of course points to benedict

00:50
xvi because in 2007 he wrote a letter to the world's Novus Ordo bishops
accompanying his apostolic letter some more on Pontifical on the use of the
traditional Latin Mass according to the missile of 1962 and here's what he said
quote I would like to draw attention to the fact that this missile was never
sure ethically abrogated and consequently in principle was always
permitted unquote and so Ferrara ceases that and says see I was right the old
Latin Mass was never actually forbidden and benedict exposed the fraud yeah well
not quite if there's fraud here it was purpose
by Benedict that the old Latin Mass was forbidden can be proved from the simple
fact that you needed an end alt to be allowed to offer it an end alt is a
concession a special permission for something that is forbidden by the

00:51
common law the first in dealt was given by John Paul the second in 1984 in the
document Quattro or a pig a nose the Congregation for divine worship stated
quote the supreme pontiff grants to diocesan bishops the possibility of
using an indulge whereby priests and faithful may be able to celebrate Mass
by using the Roman Missal according to the 1962 edition unquote and then some
conditions are enumerated in that document so when Joseph Ratzinger
Benedict the sixteenth says in 2007 that the 1962 missile was never forbidden
he's simply verifiably lying and Ferrara
is actually using a double standard here you see if benedict xvi had not said
that and had claimed instead that the old mass had indeed been forbidden you
know what Ferrara would have said he would have said that what Benedict says

00:52
there has no authority because well for one thing it's false and besides it's
not part of his Magisterium anyway because it's not part of the text of
some more implant if acum at all but is just contained in an accompanying letter
that is utterly non-binding so at best Benedict was merely expressing an
opinion and that opinion happens to be wrong hey maybe Ferrara would have even
said that Benedict not including it as part of some more Pontifical was on his
part an instinctive refusal to commit fully the authority of the papacy
concerning this error no who knows but that's how it works for Chris Farrar
that's the theology of the remnant and the Fatima Center and the semi treads
whatever the Holy See may publish our mandate it's always subject to review and

00:53
cancellation by the self-appointed Board of sifters and resistors well who needs
modernism when you have traditional Catholics like that but hey not to worry
this is Maddox according to Ferrara are the German Novus Ordo bishops yeah
remember the title of his post is Francis scarlet letter a little F from
Francis gives the TSA's Matic German Bishops everything they want but what is
sysm if we suppose that Francis is a true Pope which is what Ferrara believes
then sysm is exactly what Ferrara is doing refusal of submission to the Roman
pontiff that is sysm the official definition for sysm is refusal of
submission to the Roman pontiff or of communion with members of the church who

00:54
are subject to the Roman pontiff so then please tell us mr. Ferrara how are the
German Bishops in sysm if Francis is Pope then for them to be in sysm would
mean they're refusing submission to Francis so what does Ferrara want here
does he want them to submit to Francis really no I don't think so
so this makes no sense whatsoever and it
shows that Ferrara is really just a very skilled rhetorician and by the way the
latest on this whole topic of communion for Protestants and the Novus Ordo
Church at least as of July 4th is that the pretent Bishop of Potter born arch
layman Hans Joseph Becker has announced that in his diocese Protestants will now
be allowed to receive the invalid Novus Ordo cookie only of course in individual

00:55
cases wank wank you know I find it absolutely amazing what a gigantic fuss
is being made about this communion for Protestants thing because aside from all
the theology and all the theoretical considerations the simple fact
that in the Vatican 2 sect especially in
Germany virtually anyone who walks up to receive communion will actually receive
it you can count on one hand the number of cases where someone is actually
refused Novus Ordo Communion and talk about individual cases so just like with
amours Leticia and the question of communion for public adulterers this is
a complete non-issue in the practical order and now ladies and gentlemen from

00:56
the Jorge's mouth [Music] from the Jorge's mouth [Music]
rarely does a day pass when this man Jorge bergoglio doesn't have something
blasphemous something heretical erroneous or just downright stupid to
say so let's let's look at a few recent things on June 13th his wickedness
released a message for the world day of the poor which is observed in October
every year and in this message he makes this blasphemous assertion quote far
from the disciples of Christ nourishing sentiments of contempt or pietism
towards the poor they are called to honor them giving them precedence out of

00:57
the conviction that they are a real presence of Jesus in our midst unquote
here we see a typical modernist tactic the literal and physical real presence
of Christ in the Holy Eucharist is marginalized and reduced to being simply
one way among many of Christ's presence in the world really not significantly
different from Christ symbolic and entirely subjective presence in the poor
and the downtrodden and the unemployed and those who have to wait in line at
the immigration office and on and on it goes until they figure out that everyone
at some point is disadvantaged or inconvenienced in some way and then
everyone becomes Christ and that's really what the false Vatican two gospel

00:58
is anyway man is God man is Christ and therefore God and there's more in that
message for the world day of the poor listen to this quote I invite my brother
bishops priests and in particular deacons on whom hands have been laid for
the service of the poor as well as religious and the lay faithful men and
women who in parishes associations and ecclesial movements make tangible the
church's response to the cry of the poor to
this world day as a special moment of New Evangelization the poor evangelize
us helping us to discover everyday the beauty of the gospel let us not waste
this opportunity for grace let all of us feel on this day that we are debtors
towards the poor because stretching out our hands reciprocally one to another a
salvific encounter be created which strengthens our faith renders our

00:59
charity active and enables our hope to continue secure on the journey towards
the lord who is returning unquote and there you have it again an inversion of
the supernatural order giving precedence to the natural Christ instituted the
church to evangelize the poor not the other way around remember here's a quote
from Saint Matthew's Gospel chapter 11 verses 4 & 5 and Jesus making answer
said to them go and relate to John what you have heard and seen the blind see
the lame walk the lepers are cleansed the Deaf hear the dead rise again the
poor have the gospel preached to them but in France's religion it is the poor
who preached the gospel to the church because it's all about works of charity

01:00
it's all about the corporal works of mercy it's all about man about the body
about the temporal world man is France's object of worship under the guise of an
authentic faithfulness to the gospel to mercy and compassion Francis is trying
to gradually turn Catholicism from a religion focused on the supernatural
into an NGO focused on alleviating temporal needs and that's all that
evangelization is ultimately about for Francis and if you keep in mind now that
the Antichrist when he comes will be a great humanitarian you can see that what
we see in our day is definitely a preparation for the
Antichrist and that's why Francis could very well be the false prophet
according to sacred tradition the false prophet will herald the arrival of the
Antichrist in a way similar to how Saint John the Baptist

01:01
heralded the arrival of the true Messiah Jesus Christ so in order for the masses
to accept the Antichrist the roads must first be leveled for his teaching to
become acceptable and accept it and one way to do that especially the way to get
catholics to do that is to put in a false Pope who is believed by most to be
a true Pope but actually isn't and one who will lead the flock down into the
abyss and yes God will allow that it's part of the mystery of iniquity that God
has foretold he will permit to deceive the world in punishment for its sins and
unbelief the operation of error it's called in 2nd Thessalonians chapter 2
and Christ Himself said quote for there will rise up false Christ's and false
prophets and they shall show signs and wonders to seduce if it were possible

01:02
even the elect unquote and that's Mark 13 22 also listen to what father
Sylvester Berry wrote in his explanation of the apocalypse of Saint John
otherwise known as the book of Revelation back in 1921
yes 1921 so he can't be accused of say Davich honest bias okay here's what he
wrote commenting on chapter 13 of the Apocalypse
listen carefully because this has the potential to give you goosebumps listen
to this quote the Beast arising from the earth is a false prophet the prophet of
Antichrist our divine Savior has a representative on earth in the person of
the Pope upon whom He has conferred full powers to teach and govern likewise any
Christ will have his representative in the false prophet who will be endowed

01:03
with the plenitude of satanic powers to deceive the nation's as indicated by the
resemblance to a lamb the Prophet will probably set himself up in Rome as a
sort of anti Pope during the vacancy of the papal throne mentioned above but the
elect will not allow themselves to be deceived they will recall the words of
our Lord than if any man shall say to you lo here is Christ or there do not
believe him unquote ladies and gentlemen father Barry
in 1921 we're living it folks were living it all right here another gem
from the horse's mouth while he was in Geneva at the ecumenical World Council
of Churches on June 21st Francis encouraged his human achill
audience to work together to collaborate and carrying out works of charity

01:04
wherever possible here's what he said quote the Lord the Good Samaritan of
mankind will examine us on our love for our neighbor for each of our neighbor so
let us ask ourselves what can we do together if a particular form of service
is possible why not plan and carry it out together and thus start to
experience a more intense fraternity in the exercise of concrete charity unquote
now although this might sound fair enough at first once you really think
about it with the way things are today in the
cumin ISM it quickly becomes absurd I mean why should anyone think that a
Catholic working in a soup kitchen side-by-side with some lesbian pro abort
Methodist bishop s is something desired by Christ why should anyone think that
and I guess if some Islamists then comes along and kills that Bishop Asst

01:05
mistaking her for a Christian then what I guess she goes to heaven then and as
part of the true church somehow because a human ISM of blood
this is nauseating but that's where they're at today
welcome to the fruits of the cumin ISM it took him over 50 years to get to this
point all right one more item from the Jorge's mouth and then we'll move on On
June 6th Francis had a chat with seminarians and it's always best when he
speaks off-the-cuff because that's when you get what he really thinks that's
when you get the real him the unfiltered truth about what's really in his mind
let me quote from the report provided by crooks and I think there won't be need
for a lot of commentary quote according to the Pope we fear the Holy Spirit and
tried to cage him within gestures and doctrine an easy way to spot if the Holy

01:06
Spirit is active within someone Francis added is by seeing whether he has a
sense of humor for me a sense of humor is the human behavior that is closest to
grace he said it's that good relativism the relativism of joy the relativism of
spirituality that relativism which is born from the Holy Spirit
beyond the spiritual formation that Francis mentioned it's important to
cater to the human formation of priests as well spontaneity and not rigidity is
key for a priest to be able to be with his brothers and flock the Pope said
though he warns about the dangers this might entail without discernment if you
don't know how to caress well as fathers and his brothers it's possible that the
devil might lead you to pay for caressing Francis warned be careful unquote

01:07
there's your mystic Francis again what do you say to that now let's let's just
leave it at that thus far our examination of some of the words that
have recently impiously proceeded from the bergoglio lips but hey not all the
wickedness emanating from the vatican these days comes directly from Francis
sometimes it comes from some member of his Curia so for example on April 20th
of this year Cardinal Jean Louie Turin proclaimed
that mohammedans otherwise known as Muslims the members of Islam have a
right and a duty to proclaim their belief in Allah and to share their
religion with others well that's what I call doctrinal development back in 1965
Vatican 2 said they have a right to exercise their religion in private and

01:08
in public and now the post conciliar Church has moved on to declaring it even
a duty and not just to exercise that false religion but even to preach it to
others in the annual Vatican message to Muslims on the occasion of Ramadan the
president of the so called Pontifical Council for inter-religious dialog wrote
quote dear Muslim brothers and sisters in His Providence God the Almighty has
granted you the opportunity to observe anew the fasting of Ramadan and to
celebrate Eid al Feder and right there that's blasphemy
then yada yada yada and then we all have
the right and the duty to witness to the
all-powerful one we worship and to share
our beliefs with others while respecting their religion and religious sentiments
unquote so yeah there you have it now Muslims don't only have the right to

01:09
practice their religion they even have the duty to do so and to share it with
others but heaven forbid we Catholics should preach the true religion then
it's get off your high horse you profs daizen triumphalist you gotta get rid of
those rigid certainties you insecure crete reciting Pharisee ya know all we
get to do is wash migrants feet and scrub the floors of the local soup
kitchen you know because then we're witnessing but the Muslims of course
know they get to share their religion with others honestly if what we're
witnessing here isn't the great apostasy then I don't know what else the great
apostasy would be it's a colossal loss of faith at its very roots and it's
almost universal there's nothing left of the old faith in the external Catholic

01:10
structures and this reminds me of what st. John the Apostle wrote in his first
epistle chapter 2 verses 22 to 23 who is a liar but he who denies that Jesus is
the Christ this is Antichrist who denies the father
and the son whosoever denieth the son the same hath not the father he that
confesses the son hath the father also and speaking of denying Christ when
someone denies Dogma he denies the truth revealed by Jesus Christ and we had a
case of that recently at the remnant remnant newspaper dot-com one of their
contributors Elizabeth your wrote an article on Frances protection and
promotion of Bishop Juan Bosch in Chile whom he has since removed burrows had
long been accused of covering up sexual abuse perpetrated by father Fernando

01:11
Carr edema abuse he's been convicted of by the way okay so these are these are
not just allegations anyway Elizabeth your concludes her article at the the
remnant with these words quote the College of Cardinals should immediately
convene and remove Francis the Bishop of Rome for his gross and grave negligence
and personal complicity in the system at flouting and abuse of his own
zero-tolerance policy causing a scandal of epic proportions brought upon the
global Catholic Church and the Chilean Catholic Church unquote so here your is
saying or implying that a valid Lear aning Pope because that's what she
believes Francis to be that a validly reigning Pope can be removed from office
by his underlings that is heresy the first Vatican Council

01:12
declared in chapter 3 of its dogmatic Constitution passed returners quote the
judgment of the Apostolic See whose authority is not surpassed is to be
disclaimed by no one nor is anyone permitted to pass judgment on its
judgment therefore they stray from the straight path of truth who affirm that
it is permitted to appeal from the judgments of the Roman pontiff's to an
ecumenical council as to an authority higher than the Roman pontiff unquote
now in the show notes will link our entire article on the impossibility of
judging or de posing a true Pope so you can see all this for yourself you can
see all the argumentation all the evidence for that a true Pope cannot be
brought to trial by anyone nor can he be removed that's divine law it's
traditional Catholicism the Catholicism that the

01:13
remnant supposedly stands for the blogger Louie Vecchio who believes
Francis isn't Pope but Benedict the sixteenth is he also noticed this heresy
at the remnant and wrote a post about it
and we'll link to that in the show notes as well well you know this is serious
stuff denial of dogma is heresy now I remember someone commenting about this
on Facebook when we put out a post about the this heresy at the remnant somebody
commented and said that really we need to be more charitable here and we should
assume that the author Elizabeth your only made a mistake and didn't mean to
write something heretical and that may very well be true but what really annoys
me about that kind of a comment is that it's totally beside the point
the idea is not here to render a judgment on the subjective guilt or

01:14
innocence of Elizabeth your which obviously only God can do anyway the
idea is to point out that what has been said is heretical and therefore gravely
damaging to souls because it misleads them it contradicts God's very
revelation and for that damage to be done it doesn't matter if the author
meant to speak heresy or not and so I find this frustrating why is it that
people always focus on subjective guilt or innocence of an individual and not
about the objective facts and the damage done and aside from that there's a few
other things that need to be noted here number one if Elizabeth your does not
even know that the Pope cannot be removed from office for being morally

01:15
bad then what is she doing writing for supposedly traditional Catholic
publication secondly how in the world did this slip
past the watchful eye of the editor where is Michael Matt okay
why didn't he censor this why didn't he tell the author that she made a mistake
there and that this needs to be taken out or corrected and thirdly why now
that it's out in the open is the error still not corrected this heresy is still
up on the remnants website and it's been weeks
I believe so even if you want to allow for making mistakes and not catching
something which can happen why in the world is the heretical statement still
there everyone can draw his own conclusions here
well ladies and gentlemen we are fast approaching the end of this podcast but

01:16
I've got one more thing for you I really
don't know whether to laugh or cry about this on May 8th of this year blogger
Steven O'Reilly of the Roma Lakota East blog wrote quote if Pope Francis were
not a true Pope things would have been far worse than they have been unquote
well I guess they are just so blessed in the novus ordo church to have Francis
keeping the gates of hell from prevailing imagine the horror and the
chaos the heresy and the sacrilege the blasphemy and the impiety that would
ensue if Jorge bergoglio weren't there to keep it all from going to hell [Music]
some people just can't be helped hey everyone thank you for listening it's
been a pleasure as always to have your company please don't forget to support

01:17
noble sort of watch and tune in again next time god bless [Music] tragg cast