Please check if the Latin and English segments correspond. If not, please let me know the segment # where there's a mismatch.
| Ad secundum dicendum, quod pater spiritualis et mater spiritualis eidem non conjunguntur in generatione spirituali nisi per accidens; quia unus ad hoc per se sufficeret; unde non oportet quod ex hoc aliqua cognatio spiritualis inter eos nascatur, quin possit esse inter eos matrimonium; unde versus: unus semper erit compatrum spiritualis, alter carnalis: nec fallit regula talis. Sed per matrimonium fit vir et uxor una caro, per se loquendo; et ideo non est simile. | Reply Obj. 2: A spiritual father and spiritual mother of the same person are not joined in spiritual generation, except incidentally, for one person would suffice for this in himself. Therefore it is not necessary that by this any spiritual family relationship should come about between them, so that there could not be a marriage between them, which is why the verse says: one of the compaters will always be spiritual, the other physical: nor does such a rule fail. But by marriage, a husband and wife are made one flesh, speaking per se; and therefore, it is not the same. |
data scraped September 2021 (= that of March 2025 still) from Aquinas Translation Project
See the Latin 🇻🇦 → English 🇬🇧 translation model trained on the above data.