| Hic est liber
|
This is the book
|
Pars 1
Commendatio sacrae Scripturae
| Part 1
A Commendation of Sacred Scripture
|
Hic liber mandatorum Dei et lex quae est in aeternum omnes qui tenent eam ad vitam qui autem dereliquerint eam in mortem.
|
This is the book of the commandments of God, and the law that is for ever. All that keep it shall come to life: but they that have forsaken it, to death. — Baruch 4.1
|
| Secundum Augustinum, in IV de doctrina Christiana, eruditus eloquens ita eloqui debet ut doceat, ut delectet, ut flectat: ut doceat ignaros; ut delectet tediosos; ut flectat tardos. Haec tria completissime sacrae Scripturae eloquium. Docet enim firmiter aeterna sua veritate, Psalm.: in aeternum, domine, permanet verbum tuum. Delectat suaviter sua utilitate, Psalm.: quam dulcia faucibus meis eloquia tua. Flectit efficaciter sua auctoritate, Ier. XXIII: nunquid non verba mea sunt quasi ignis, dicit dominus?
| According to Augustine in On Christian Doctrine 4:12 one skilled in speech should so speak as to teach, to delight and to change; that is, to teach the ignorant, to delight the bored and to change the lazy. The speech of Sacred Scripture does these three things in the fullest manner. For it firmly teaches with its eternal truth. Psalm 118:89: ‘Your word, O Lord, stands firm for ever as heaven.’ And it sweetly delights with its pleasantness. Psalm 118.103: ‘How sweet are your words to my mouth!’ And it efficaciously changes with its authority. Jeremiah 23:29: ‘Are my words not like fire, says the Lord?’
|
| Et ideo sacra Scriptura in verbo proposito commendatur a tribus: primo ab auctoritate qua flectit, cum dicit: hic est liber mandatorum Dei. Secundo, ab aeterna veritate qua instruit, cum dicit: et lex quae est in aeternum. Tertio, ab utilitate qua allicit, cum dicit: omnes qui tenent eam pervenient ad vitam.
| Therefore in the text above Sacred Scripture is commended for three things. First, for the authority with which it changes: ‘This is the book of the commandments of God.’ Second, for the eternal truth with which it instructs, when it says, ‘and the law that is for ever’. Third, for the usefulness with which it entices, when it says, ‘All that keep it shall come to life.’
|
| Auctoritas autem huius Scripturae ex tribus ostenditur efficax. Primo ex origine; quia Deus origo eius est. Unde dicit: mandatorum Dei; Baruch III: hic adinvenit omnem viam disciplinae; Hebr. II: quae cum initium accepisset enarrari per dominum, ab eis qui audierunt, in nos confirmata est. Cui quidem auctori infallibiliter credendum est; tum propter naturae suae conditionem, quia veritas est, Ioan. XIV: ego sum via, veritas et vita; tum propter scientiae plenitudinem, Rom. XI: o altitudo divitiarum sapientiae et scientiae Dei; tum propter verborum virtutem, Hebr. IV: vivus est sermo Dei et efficax, et penetrabilior omni gladio ancipiti.
| The authority of this Scripture is shown in three things. First, its origin, because God is its origin. Hence it says, the commandments of God’. Baruch 3.37: ‘He found out all the way of knowledge.’ Hebrews 2:3: ‘For it was first announced by the Lord and was confirmed unto us.’ Such an author is infallibly to be believed, both on account of the condition of his nature, because he is truth; John 14:4: ‘I am the way and the truth and the life.’ And on account of his fullness of knowledge; Romans 11:33: ‘Oh, the depth of the riches of the wisdom and of the knowledge of God!’ And also on account of the power of the words; Hebrews 4:12: ‘For the word of God is living and efficient and keener than any two-edged sword.’
|
| Secundo, ostenditur efficax ex necessitate quam scilicet imponit, Marc. ult.: qui autem non crediderit condemnabitur, et cetera. Unde per modum praecepti veritas sacrae Scripturae proponitur; unde dicit: mandatorum Dei. Quae quidem mandata intellectum per fidem dirigunt, Ioan. XIV: creditis in Deum et in me credite; per dilectionem affectum informant, Ioan. XV: hoc est praeceptum meum ut diligatis invicem, sicut dilexi vos; quod ad actum et executionem inducunt: hoc fac, et vives.
| Second, it is shown to be efficacious by the necessity with which it is imposed. Mark 16.16: ‘He who does not believe shall be condemned.’ The truth of Sacred Scripture is proposed in the manner of a precept, hence the text says, ‘the commandments of God’. These commandments direct the intellect through faith: ‘You believe in God, believe also in me’, John 14:1; inform the affections with love: ‘This is my commandment, that you love one another’, John 15:12; and induce to action: ‘Do this and you shall live’, Luke 10:28.
|
| Tertio, ostenditur efficax ex dictorum uniformitate, quia omnes qui sacram doctrinam tradiderunt, idem docuerunt, I Cor. XV: sive autem ego, sive illi sic praedicamus, et sic credidistis. Et hoc necesse est quia omnes habuerunt unum magistrum, Matth. XXIII: unus est magister vester, etc.; unum habuerunt spiritum, II Cor. XII: nonne eodem spiritu ambulavimus? Unum insuper affectum, Act. IV: multitudinis credentium una erat anima et cor unum in Deo. Et ideo in signum uniformitatis doctrinae dicitur singulariter: hic est liber.
| Third, it is shown to be efficacious by the uniformity of its sayings, because all who teach the sacred doctrine teach the same thing. 1 Corinthians 15:11: ‘Whether then it is I or they, so we preach, and so you have believed.’ And this is necessary because they all had one teacher. Matthew 23:8: ‘Your teacher is one.’ And they had one spirit, ‘Have we not walked in the same spirit?’ and one love from above, ‘Now the multitude of believers were of one heart and one soul’ (Acts 4:32). Therefore, as a sign of the uniformity of doctrine, it says significantly, ‘This is the book.’
|
| Veritas Scripturae huius doctrinae est immutabilis et aeterna. Unde sequitur: et lex quae est in aeternum. Luc. XXI: caelum et terra transibunt; verba autem mea non transibunt. Permanet autem in aeternum haec lex propter tria: primo, propter legislatoris potestatem, Isa. XIV: Deus exercituum decrevit, et quis poterit infirmare? Secundo, propter eius immutabilitatem, Malach. III: ego Deus et non mutor. Num. XXIII: non est dominus quasi homo ut mentiatur; nec ut filius hominis ut mutetur. Tertio, propter legis veritatem, Psal.: omnia mandata tua veritas. Prov. XII: labium veritatis firmum erit in perpetuum. III Esdr. IV: veritas manet et invalescit in aeternum.
| The truth of this teaching of Scripture is immutable and eternal, hence the words, ‘and the law that is for ever’. Luke 21.33: ‘Heaven and earth will pass away but my words shall not pass away.’ This law will endure for ever because of three things: First, because of the power of the lawgiver. Isaiah 14:27: ‘For the Lord of hosts hath decreed, and who can disannul it.’ Second, on account of his immutability. Malachi 3:6: ‘For I am the Lord and I do not change’; Numbers 23:19: ‘God is not a man, that he should lie: nor like the son of man, that he should be changed.’ Third, because of the truth of the law. Psalm 118:86: ‘All your commandments are faithful.’ Proverbs 12:19: ‘The lip of truth shall be steadfast for ever.’ 3 Ezra 4:38: ‘Truth remains and gathers strength eternally.’
|
| Utilitas autem huius Scripturae est maxima, Isai. XLVIII: ego dominus Deus tuus docens te utilia. Unde sequitur: omnes qui tenent eam pervenient ad vitam; quae quidem triplex est. Prima est vita gratiae, ad quam sacra Scriptura disponit, Ioan. VI: verba quae ego locutus sum vobis, spiritus et vita sunt. Per hanc enim vitam spiritus Deo vivit, Gal. II: vivo autem, iam non ego: vivit vero in me Christus. Secunda est vita iustitiae in operibus consistens, ad quam sacra Scriptura dirigit, Psal.: in aeternum non obliviscar iustificationes tuas; quia in eis vivificasti me. Tertia est vita gloriae, quam sacra Scriptura promittit et ad eam perducit, Ioan. VI: domine, ad quem ibimus? Verba vitae aeternae habes. Eodem, XX: haec autem scripta sunt ut credatis; et ut credentes vitam habeatis in nomine ipsius.
| The usefulness of this Scripture is the greatest: ‘I am the Lord your God who teaches you profitable things.’ Hence our text continues: ‘All who keep it shall come to life.’ Which indeed is threefold: First it is the life of grace, to which Sacred Scripture disposes. John 6:64: ‘The words that I have spoken to you are spirit and life.’ For through this life the spirit lives in God. Galatians 2:20: ‘It is now no longer I that live, but Christ lives in me.’ Second is the life of justice consisting in works, to which Sacred Scripture directs. Psalm 118.93: ‘Your decrees I will never forget, for by them you have given me life.’ Third is the life of glory which Sacred Scripture promises and to which it leads. John 6.69: ‘Lord, to whom shall we go? you have the words of everlasting life.’ John 20:31: ‘But these are written that you may believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God, and that believing you may have life in his name.’
|
|
| The Division of Sacred Scripture
|
Pars 2
Partitio sacrae Scripturae
| Part 2
|
| Ad hanc autem vitam sacra Scriptura perducit dupliciter: scilicet, praecipiendo et adiuvando. Praecipiendo per mandata quae proponit, quod pertinet ad vetus testamentum, Eccli. XXIV: legem mandavit nobis Moyses. Adiuvando autem per donum gratiae quod legislator largitur, quod pertinet ad novum testamentum. Ioan. I: lex per Moysen data est, gratia et veritas per Iesum Christum facta est.
| Sacred Scripture leads to this life in two ways, by commanding and by helping. Commanding through the mandates which it proposes, which belong to the Old Testament. Sirach 24-33: ‘Moses commanded a law in the precepts of justice.’ Helping, through the gift of grace which the lawgiver dispenses, which pertains to the New Testament. Both of these are touched on in John 1:17: ‘For the Law was given through Moses; grace and truth came through Jesus Christ.’
|
| Unde tota sacra Scriptura in duas partes principaliter dividitur, scilicet, in vetus et novum testamentum; quae duo tanguntur Matth. XIII: omnis Scriba doctus in regno caelorum similis est ei qui profert de thesauro suo nova et vetera. Et Cant. VII: omnia poma, nova et vetera, dilecte mi, servavi tibi.
| Hence the whole of Sacred Scripture is divided into two principal parts, the Old and New Testaments, which are mentioned in Matthew 13:52: ‘So then every Scribe instructed in the kingdom of heaven is like a householder who brings forth from his storeroom things new and old.’ And Song of Songs 7:13: ‘In our gates are all fruits, the new and the old, my beloved, I have kept for you.’
|
| Vetus autem testamentum dividitur secundum doctrinam mandatorum, est enim duplex mandatum, scilicet coactorium et monitorium. Coactorium est mandatum regis qui potest transgressores punire, Prov. XX: sicut rugitus leonis, ita et terror regis. Sed monitorium est praeceptum patris qui habet erudire, Eccli. VII: filii tibi sunt? Erudi illos. Praeceptum autem regis est duplex, scilicet unum, quo legem statuit; aliud quod ad observantiam statutae legis inducit, quod consuevit per suos praecones et nuntios promulgare. Et sic distinguuntur tria praecepta, scilicet regis, praeconis et patris. Et secundum haec tria vetus testamentum dividitur in tres partes, secundum Hieronymum in prologo libri regum.
| The Old Testament is divided according to the teaching of the commandments, for the commandment is of two kinds, the binding and the warning. The binding is the command of a king who can punish transgressors. Proverbs 20:2: ‘As the roaring of a lion, so also is the dread of a king.’ But a warning is the precept of a father who must teach. Sirach 7:25: ‘Do you have you children? Instruct them.’ The precept of a king is of two kinds, one which establishes the laws, another which induces to observance of the law, which is customarily done through his heralds and ambassadors. Thus it is that three kinds of command are distinguished, that of the king, that of the herald and that of the father. On this basis the Old Testament is subdivided into three parts, according to Jerome in his prologue to the Book of Kings.
|
| Prima pars continetur in lege, quae est quasi praeceptum ab ipso rege propositum, Isai. XXXIII: dominus rex noster, dominus legifer noster.
| The first part is contained in the law which is proposed by the king himself. Isaiah 33:22: ‘For the Lord is our judge, the Lord is our lawgiver, the Lord is our King.’
|
| Secunda continetur in prophetis, qui fuerunt quasi nuntii et praecones Dei ex persona Dei populo loquentes et ad observantiam legis inducentes, Aggaei I: dixit Aggaeus, de nuntiis domini.
| The second is contained in the Prophets who were, as it were, ambassadors and heralds of God, speaking to the people in the person of God, and urging them to observance of the law. Haggai 11:13: ‘And Haggai, the messenger of the Lord, as one of the messengers of the Lord, spoke.’
|
| Tertia continetur in Agiographis, qui spiritu sancto inspirati locuti sunt non tamen ex parte domini, sed quasi ex se ipsis. Unde Agiographi dicuntur quasi sacri scriptores, vel quasi sacra scribentes, ab agios quod est sacrum et graphia quod est Scriptura: et sic praecepta quae in eis continentur sunt quasi paterna. Ut patet Prov. VI: fili mi, custodi praecepta patris tui, et cetera.
| The third is contained in the works of hagiographers, writers who were inspired by the Holy Spirit and spoke as for themselves and not for God. Hence they are called saintly writers because they were writers of the sacred, agios meaning ‘sacred’, and graphia meaning ‘scripture’. Thus the precepts found in them are paternal. As is evident in Proverbs 6:20: ‘My son, keep the commandments of your father.’
|
| Ponit tamen Hieronymus quartum librorum ordinem, scilicet, apocryphos: et dicuntur apocryphi ab apo, quod est valde et cryphon, quod est obscurum, quia de eorum sententiis vel auctoribus dubitatur. Ecclesia vero Catholica quosdam libros recepit in numero sanctarum Scripturarum, de quorum sententiis non dubitatur, sed de auctoribus. Non quod nesciatur qui fuerint illorum librorum auctores, sed quia homines illi non fuerunt notae auctoritatis. Unde ex auctoritate auctorum robur non habent, sed magis ex Ecclesiae receptione. Quia tamen idem modus loquendi in eis et in Agiographis observatur, ideo simul cum eis computentur ad praesens.
| Jerome mentions a fourth kind of book, namely, the apocryphal, so called from apo, that is, ‘especially’, and cryphon, that is, ‘obscure’, because there is doubt about their contents and authors. The Catholic Church includes among the books of Sacred Scripture some whose teachings are not doubted, but whose authors are. Not that the authors are unknown, but because these men were not of known authority. Hence they do not have force from the authority of the authors but rather from their reception by the Church. Because there is the same manner of speaking in them and in the hagiographical works, they are for now counted among them.
|
| Prima autem pars, quae legem continet, in duas partes dividitur; secundum quod duplex est lex, scilicet, publica et privata.
| The first part, which contains the law, is divided into two parts, insofar as there are two kinds of law, public and private.
|
| Privata lex est quae uni personae vel familiae imponitur observanda. Et talis lex in Genesi continetur, ut patet de primo praecepto homini dato, Gen. II 17: de ligno scientiae boni et mali ne comedas; et Noe, Gen. IX 4: carnem cum sanguine non comedetis; et Abrahae: Gen. XVII 9: custodies pactum meum et semen tuum post te in generationibus suis.
| A private law is imposed for the observance of one person or one family. Such law is contained in Genesis, as is evident from the first precept given to man, ‘But of the tree of knowledge of good and evil ‘you shall not eat’ (2:17), and to Noah, ‘Saving that flesh with blood you shall not eat’ (9:4), and to Abraham, ‘And again God said to Abraham: And you therefore shall keep my covenant, and your descendants after you in their generations’ (17:9).
|
| Lex autem publica est quae populo traditur. Lex enim divina populo Iudaeorum tradita est per mediatorem, quia non erat idoneus populus ut immediate a Deo susciperet, Deut. V, unde: ego sequester fui et medius inter vos et dominum. Gal. III: lex ordinata est per Angelos in manu mediatoris. Et ideo in legislatione duplex gradus attenditur. Unus quo lex a domino ad mediatorem pervenit, et hoc pertinet ad tres libros, scilicet: Exodum, Leviticum, numeros. Unde frequenter in illis libris legitur: locutus est Deus ad Moysen. Secundus gradus est quo lex per mediatorem populo exponitur; et hoc pertinet ad Deuteronomium, ut patet ex hoc quod in eius principio dicitur: locutus est Moyses, et cetera.
| The public law is that which is given to the people. For the divine law was given to the Jewish people through a mediator, because it was not fitting that the people should receive it immediately from God. Deuteronomy 5:5: ‘I was the mediator and stood between the Lord and You and at that time to show you his words.’ Galatians 3.19: ‘What then was the Law? It was enacted on account of transgressors, being delivered by angels through a mediator.’ Thus a twofold level is found in legislation. First, when the law comes from the Lord to the mediator, and this pertains to three books, Exodus, Leviticus and Numbers. Hence we frequently read in them, ‘God spoke to Moses.’ Second, when the law is given to the people by the mediator, and this pertains to Deuteronomy, as is evident from its very beginning, ‘These are the words which Moses spoke to all Israel.’
|
| Tres autem libri praedicti distinguuntur secundum tria in quibus oportebat populum ordinari: primo in praeceptis quantum ad iudicii aequitatem, et hoc fit in Exodo; secundo in sacramentis quantum ad cultus exhibitionem, et hoc fit in Levitico; tertio in officiis, quantum ad rei publicae administrationem, et hoc fit in libro numerorum.
| These three books are distinguished by the three things in which a people should be ordered. First, precepts bearing on equity of judgement, and this is found in Exodus. Second, in sacraments with respect to the establishment of worship, and this in Leviticus. And third, in offices, with respect to the administration of the community, and this in Numbers.
|
| Secunda autem pars, quae est prophetarum, dividitur in duas partes, secundum quod nuntius duo debet facere. Debet enim exponere regis beneficium ut inclinentur homines ad obediendum; et debet proponere legis edictum.
| The second part, which is the prophets, is subdivided insofar as a herald ought to do two things. He should manifest the beneficence of the king, so that men will be inclined to obey, and he should declare the edict of the law.
|
| Triplex autem beneficium divinum prophetae populo exposuerunt: primo haereditatis consecutionem, et hoc in Iosue, de quo Eccli. XLVI: fortis in bello Iosue; secundo hostium destructionem, et hoc in libro Iudicum, de quorum destructione in Psalmo: fiat illis sicut Madian et Sisarae; tertio populi exaltationem; quae quidem est duplex, scilicet: privata unius personae, et de hoc in Ruth; et publica quae est totius populi, usque ad regiam dignitatem, et de hoc in libro regum: quod beneficium Deus improperat eis Ezech. XVI: decora facta es vehementer. Hi enim libri, secundum Hieronymum in ordine prophetarum ponuntur.
| There is a threefold divine beneficence that the prophets expose to the people. First, the effect of heredity, and this in Joshua, of which Sirach 46:1 says, ‘Valiant in war was Joshua.’ Second, the destruction of armies, and this in the book of Judges, of whose destruction Psalm 82:10 says, ‘Do to them as to Madian, as to Sisara.’ Third, the exultation of the people, which is twofold, namely the private exaltation of one person, and this in Ruth, and a public which is of the whole people, and this in Kings, which benefice God grants to them. Ezekiel 16.13: ‘And you were adorned with gold and silver.’ For these books, according to Jerome, are placed in the rank of prophets.
|
| In aliis autem libris qui communiter prophetarum dicuntur, prophetae posuerunt divina edicta ad legis observationem. Et hoc dicitur, primo in communi; et hoc in prophetis maioribus qui ad totum populum mittebantur et ad totius legis observantiam inducebant; secundo in particulari; et hoc in prophetis minoribus, quorum diversi, propter diversa ad speciales gentes mittebantur, sicut Osee ad decem tribus; Ioel ad senes Israel; Ionas ad Ninivitas; et sic de aliis.
| In other books which are commonly said to be of the prophets, the prophets posed divine edicts for the observance of the law. And this is said, first, in general, in the major prophets who were sent to the whole people and called for the observance of the whole law; second, in particular, and this in the minor prophets, different ones of whom were sent for different reasons to special tribes, as Hosea to the ten tribes of Joel, Jonah to the Ninevites, and so with the rest.
|
| Prophetae autem maiores dividuntur secundum ea quibus ad observantiam legis prophetae populum induxerunt: scilicet blandiendo per promissiones beneficiorum; terrendo per comminationem paenarum; arguendo per vituperationes peccatorum. Quamvis haec tria in singulis prophetarum inveniantur, tamen Isaias principaliter blanditur; de quo dicitur Eccli. XLVIII: consolatus est lugentes in Sion; Ieremias vero comminatur, unde dicebat: de industria dissolvit manus virorum bellantium Ier. XXXVIII; sed Ezechiel arguit et vituperat, Ezech. XVI: pater tuus Amorrhaeus et mater tua Cethaea.
| The major prophets differ according to the different ways the prophets sought to lead the people to observance of the law, namely, cajoling by the promise of benefits, frightening with the threat of punishment, arguing by condemnation of sins. Although each of these is found in every prophet, Isaiah chiefly cajoles, as is said in Sirach 48-27: ‘With a great spirit he saw the things that are come to pass at last, and comforted the mourners in Sion.’ Jeremiah chiefly warns, hence Jeremiah 3 8-4: ‘He weakened the hands of the men of war that remain in this city.’ But Ezekiel argues and scolds. Ezekiel 16-3: ‘Your father was an Amorite and your mother a Hittite.’
|
| Potest tamen aliter distingui, ut dicatur quod Isaias praenunciat principaliter incarnationis mysterium, unde tempore adventus in Ecclesia legitur; Ieremias vero mysterium passionis, unde legitur tempore passionis; Ezechiel mysterium resurrectionis, unde in resurrectione ossium et templi reparatione librum suum finit; Daniel autem secundum quod inter prophetas computatur ex hoc quod spiritu prophetico praedixit futura, quamvis non ex persona domini populo loqueretur, prosequitur de divinitate Christi, ut quatuor prophetae quatuor Evangelistis respondeant, vel etiam de advocatione ad iudicium.
| They can be distinguished in another way, insofar as Isaiah chiefly foretells the mystery of the Incarnation, which is why he is read during the time of Advent by the Church, and Jeremiah the mystery of the Passion, hence he is read in Passiontide, and Ezekiel the mystery of the Resurrection, hence his book finishes with the raising of the bones and the repair of the temple. Daniel, however, is included among the prophets insofar as he predicted future events in a prophetic spirit; although he did not speak to the people in the person of the Lord, he dealt with the divinity of Christ. Thus the four prophets answer to the four evangelists, and also to the call to judgement.
|
| Tertia autem pars, quae continet Agiographos et apocryphos libros, in duo distinguitur, secundum duo quibus patres instruunt filios ad virtutem, scilicet verbo et facto; quia exempla in moralibus non minus valent quam verba. Quaedam autem instruunt facto tantum; quaedam verbo tantum; quaedam verbo et facto.
| The third part, which contains the hagiographic and the apocryphal books, is subdivided according to the two ways fathers instruct their sons in virtue, namely, by word and deed, since in morals examples are no less important than words. Some teach by deed alone, some by word alone, some by word and deed.
|
| Facto autem dupliciter. Uno modo instruendo de futuro ad cautelam; et hoc est in Iosue, quem Hieronymus inter Agiographos ponit. Quamvis enim propheta ex dono prophetiae esset, non tamen ex officio; quia non fuit a domino missus ad prophetandum populo. Unde quod Sap. VIII dicitur, de eo intelligi potest: signa et monstra scit antequam fiant. Alio modo narrando ad exemplum virtutis praeterita. Virtutes autem principales sunt quattuor, scilicet: iustitia, qua est bonum commune, cuius exemplum ponitur in Paralipomenis, in quo totius populi status describitur qui per iustitiam gubernatur. Secunda est temperantia, cuius exemplum ponitur in Iudith; unde Hieronymus: accipite Iudith viduam castitatis exemplum. Iudith XV: fecisti viriliter eo quod castitatem amaveris. Tertia est fortitudo, cui duo competunt, scilicet, aggredi; et quantum ad hoc ponitur exemplum in libro Machabaeorum; et sustinere et quantum ad hoc ponitur exemplum in Thobia, Thob. II: hanc autem tentationem ideo permisit dominus evenire illi, ut posteris daretur exemplum patientiae eius. Quarta est prudentia, cuius est obviare insidiis; et quantum ad hoc ponitur exemplum eius in Esdra. In illo enim libro ostenditur quomodo Esdras et Neemias et alii principes prudenter caverunt insidias inimicorum volentium impedire aedificationem templi et civitatis. Est etiam prudentiae sagaciter repellere violentias; et quantum ad hoc datur eius exemplum in libro Hester: ubi ostenditur quomodo Mardocheus et Hester Aman potentissimi fraudes eliserunt.
| By deed, however, in two ways. One, instructing about the future by warning, and this in Joshua, whom Jerome places among the hagiographs. For although one is a prophet because of the gift of prophecy, this is not his office, because he was not sent by God to prophesy to the people. Hence what is said in Wisdom 8:8 can be applied to the prophet: ‘She knows signs and wonders before they are done.’ In another way, speaking of past events as examples of virtue. There are four principal virtues, namely justice, which serves the common good, an example of which is given in Chronicles, in which the condition of a whole people who were governed with justice is described. The second is temperance, an example of which is given in Judith, which is why Jerome says, ‘Take Judith as an example of the chaste widow.’ Judith 15. 11: ‘For you have acted manfully, and your heart has been strengthened, because you loved chastity.’ Third is fortitude, which has two attributes. To attack, and an example of this is found in the Book of Maccabees; and to endure, and an example of this is found in Tobit 2:12: ‘Now this trial the Lord therefore permitted to happen to him, that an example might be given to posterity of his patience.’ The fourth is prudence, by which dangers are avoided, and an example of this is given in Ezra. For in that book we are shown how Ezra and Nehemiah and other princes prudently guarded against the plots of enemies wishing to impede the building of the temple and the city. It also pertains to prudence wisely to repel the violent, and an example of this is given in Esther, where it is shown how Mordecai and Esther handled the deceptions of the most powerful Haman.
|
| Libri autem Agiographi et apocryphi, qui tantum instruunt verbo, distinguuntur secundum quod verbum dupliciter ad instructionem operatur: uno modo petendo sapientiae donum, Sap. VII: optavi et datus est mihi sensus, invocavi et venit in me spiritus sapientiae. Et ad instructionem operatur Psalterium, per modum orationis Deo loquens. Secundo modo sapientiam docendo, et hoc dupliciter, secundum duplex opus sapientis; quorum unum est mentientem manifestare posse: et quantum ad hoc est liber Iob, qui per modum disputationis errores elidit, Iob XIII: disputare cum Deo cupio prius vos ostendens fabricatores mendacii et cultores perversorum dogmatum. Aliud opus eius est non mentiri de quibus novit; et sic dupliciter instruimur: quia vel commendatur nobis sapientia, et hoc in libro sapientiae; vel sapientiae praecepta proponuntur, et hoc in tribus libris Salomonis: qui quidem distinguuntur secundum tres gradus virtutum quos Plotinus distinguit; quia praecepta sapientiae non nisi de actibus virtutum esse debent. In primo gradu, secundum eum, sunt virtutes politicae, quibus homo moderate rebus mundi utitur et inter homines conversatur; et secundum hoc est liber proverbiorum. In secundo gradu sunt virtutes purgatoriae, quibus homo se a rebus mundi exuit per contemptum; et secundum hoc est Ecclesiastes qui ad contemptum mundi ordinatur, ut patet per Hieronymum in prologo. In tertio gradu sunt virtutes purgati animi, quibus homo, saeculi curis penitus calcatis, in sola sapientiae contemplatione delectatur; et quantum ad hoc sunt cantica. In quarto autem gradu sunt virtutes exemplares in Deo existentes, de quibus praecepta sapientiae non dantur, sed magis derivantur ab eis.
| The hagiographical and apocryphal books which instruct by word, are divided insofar as words work in a twofold way to instruct, in one way, by asking for the gift of wisdom. Wisdom 7:7: ‘Wherefore I have wished, and understanding was given me, and I called upon God, and the spirit of wisdom came upon me.’ This is how the Psalter instructs, speaking to God in prayer. In another way, by teaching wisdom, and this in two ways according to the twofold work of wisdom, one of which is to expose the liar, and Job who drove out errors by way of disputation exhibits this. Job 13.3-4: ‘But yet I will speak to the Almighty and I desire to reason with God, having first shown that you are forgers of lies and maintainers of perverse opinions.’ The other work is not to lie about what it knows, and thus we are instructed in a twofold way, because either wisdom is commended to us, and this in the book of Wisdom, or the precepts of wisdom are proposed, and this in the three books of Solomon, which indeed differ according to the three grades of virtue that Plotinus, in Enneads 1.1.2.2-7, distinguishes, since the precepts of wisdom ought to concern only the acts of virtue. In the first grade, according to him, are political virtues, whereby a man moderately uses the things of this world and lives among men, and this in the Proverbs. In the second grade are the purgative virtues, whereby a man regards the world with contempt, and this in Ecclesiastes, which aims at contempt of the world, as is clear from Jerome’s prologue. In the third grade are the virtues of the purged soul, whereby a man, wholly cleansed of worldly cares, delights in the contemplation of wisdom alone, and this is found in the Song of Songs. In the fourth grade are the exemplar virtues existing in God, concerning which precepts of wisdom are not given but are rather derived from them.
|
| Verbo autem simul et facto instruit Ecclesiasticus. Unde praecepta sapientiae qui proposuit, in laude patrum librum suum terminavit, ut patet a XLIV capitulo et deinceps.
| In word and in deed Sirach instructs. Hence the precepts of wisdom in praise of fathers close his book, as is clear in Chapter 44 and after.
|
| Novum autem testamentum, quod ad vitam aeternam ordinat, non solum per praecepta, sed per gratiae dona, dividitur in tres partes. In prima agitur de gratiae origine: et hoc in Evangeliis. In secunda de gratiae virtute: et hoc in epistolis Pauli; unde in principio a virtute Evangelii incipit dicens: virtus Dei est in salutem omni credenti. Rom. I. In tertia agitur de virtutis praedictae executione: et hoc in reliquis libris novi testamenti.
| The New Testament, which is ordered to eternal life not only through precepts but also through the gifts of grace, is divided into three parts. In the first the origin of grace is treated, in the Gospels. in the second, the power of grace, and this in the epistles of Paul, hence he begins in the power of the Gospel, in Romans 1:16 saying, ‘For I am not ashamed of the Gospel, for it is the power of God unto salvation to everyone who believes.’ In the third, the execution of the aforesaid virtues is treated, and this in the rest of the books of the New Testament.
|
| Origo autem gratiae Christus est, Ioan. I: de plenitudine eius omnes accepimus, gratiam pro gratia, quia lex per Moysen data est, gratia et veritas per Iesum Christum facta est. In Christo autem est considerare duplicem naturam, scilicet: divinam: et de hoc est principaliter Evangelium Ioannis, unde incipit: in principio erat verbum et verbum erat apud Deum, et Deus erat verbum; et humanam: et de hac principaliter tractant alii Evangelistae, qui distinguuntur secundum tres dignitates, quae Christo homini competunt. De ipso enim quantum ad dignitatem regiam determinat Matthaeus; unde in principio sui Evangelii eum secundum carnem a regibus descendisse ostendit et a magis regibus adoratum. Sed quantum ad dignitatem propheticam determinat de eo Marcus; unde a praedicatione eius Evangelium incipit. Quantum vero ad sacerdotalem dignitatem determinat de eo Lucas; unde a templo incipit et a sacerdotio, et in templo finit Evangelium, et frequenter circa templum versatur, ut dicit quaedam Glossa Luc. II super illud: invenerunt eum in templo sedentem in medio doctorum.
| Christ is the origin of grace. John 1:16-17: ‘And of his fullness we have all received, grace for grace. For the Law was given through Moses: grace and truth came through Jesus Christ.’ In Christ a twofold nature is to be considered, a divine, and the Gospel of John is chiefly concerned with this, hence he begins, ‘In the beginning was the Word and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.’ And a human, and the other Gospels treat chiefly of this, and they are distinguished according to the threefold dignity that belongs to the man Christ. With respect to his royal honour, Matthew speaks. Hence in the beginning of his Gospel he shows that Christ descended from kings and was adored by the Magi kings. With respect to his prophetic honour, Mark speaks, hence he begins with the preaching of the Gospel. With respect to his priestly dignity, Luke speaks, and he begins with the temple and the priesthood and ends his Gospel in the temple, and frequently returns to the temple, as the Gloss says about Luke 2.46: ‘And they found him sitting in the temple in the midst of the teachers.’
|
| Vel aliter, ut dicatur quod Matthaeus determinat de Christo principaliter quantum ad mysterium incarnationis; et ideo in figura hominis describitur; Lucas quantum ad mysterium passionis; et ideo describitur in figura bovis, quod est animal immolatitium; Marcus vero quantum ad victoriam resurrectionis; et ideo describitur in figura leonis; Iohannes vero, qui ad alta divinitatis eius volat, per aquilam designatur.
| In another way, Matthew might be said to speak of Christ chiefly with respect to the mystery of the Incarnation, and thus he is depicted in the figure of a man. Luke, with respect to the mystery of the Passion, and therefore he is depicted as a bull, which is an animal to be immolated. Mark, with respect to the victory of the Resurrection, and thus he is depicted as a lion. But John, who soars to the heights of his divinity, is depicted as an eagle.
|
| [The part dealing with the power of grace as exemplified in the epistles of Paul is missing from the text.]
|
| Executio autem virtutis gratiae ostenditur in progressu Ecclesiae, in quo est tria considerare. Primo Ecclesiae initium; et de hoc agitur in actibus apostolorum; unde dicit Hieronymus: actus apostolorum nudam videntur sonare historiam et nascentis Ecclesiae infantiam texere. Secundo Ecclesiae profectum; et ad hunc ordinatur instructio apostolica in epistolis canonicis. Tertio Ecclesiae terminum; in quo totius sacrae Scripturae continentiam Apocalypsis concludit, quousque sponsa in thalamum Iesu Christi ad vitam gloriosam participandam; ad quam nos perducat ipse Iesus Christus, benedictus in saecula saeculorum. Amen.
| The execution of the power of grace is shown in the progress of the Church, in which there are three things to consider. First, the beginning of the Church, and this is treated in the Acts of the Apostles, hence Jerome says, in his preface to the Pentateuch, that ‘The Acts of the Apostles seem to give the bare history of the birth and to clothe the infant Church.’ Second, the progress of the Church, and to this is ordered the apostolic instruction of the canonical epistles. Third, the end of the Church, with which the whole content of Scripture concludes in the Apocalypse, with the spouse in the abode of Jesus Christ sharing the life of glory, to which Jesus Christ himself conducts, and may he be blessed for ever and ever. Amen.
|